Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 07 Sep 2006 (Thursday) 21:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Blurry subject, sharp background in V-ball - HELP!!!

 
davidmigl
Member
189 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Sep 07, 2006 21:21 |  #1

Hello,

Just returned from a round of volleyball games with ~400 shots. I shot with the Digital Rebel XT (350d) and Mark I f/1.8 50mm. ISO 1600, 1/500, f/2.2. Many of the shots are unusable due to focus issues - the background is tack sharp, the subject, blurry. I was using AI servo with the center autofocus point and when I noticed this, switched to all autofocus points to see if my camera would do any better. Nope. What am I doing wrong??? Is this a matter of the lens not having enough time to focus?? Do I just need to get the 1.2 L 85mm??


Thanks for your help!!
David Migl


Canon Digital Rebel XT (Silver) | 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Kit lens | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 | 85mm f/1.8 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Sep 08, 2006 03:28 |  #2

Looks like you've focused behind the subject... the 50mm 1.8 isn't the fastest or most accurate focusing lens ever but it's not too bad... it probably won't be able to keep up with fast moving targets, though, or at least mine didn't. Manual focus may help a little but the 50mm 1.4 or 85mm 1.8 are much faster with the autofocus, especially the 85...

I don't often shoot this stuff, other people may be able to offer more helpful advice :p It's difficult to say prefocus the lens because the 1.8 doesn't have full time manual focus.. it'd probably make it a bit easier...


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sando
Goldmember
Avatar
2,868 posts
Joined Apr 2006
     
Sep 08, 2006 03:33 |  #3

Focus is way off. Looks to be on the guy in the BG, but even at 1/500s it looks blurred.


- Matt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Sep 08, 2006 04:01 |  #4

I'd say that the shutter speed is fine. The ball's not blurred, it's bokeh'd.

Not that I'd done any sports photography, I'd say that f/2.2 would give a depth of focus that's far too small, you'd end up with arms and legs that would be out of focus if they were more than a couple of feet in front of or behind the focus point.

I'd think it's because the AI servo can't copy with this kind of situation, it's more geared toward cars, planes moving in a predictable, smooth action. The AI server is probably overcompensating here and can't deal with quick changes of direction. Normal, multipoint AF would probably have been the best option here..

Chimping every few shots would have helped saved the majority of the shots as well.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Sep 08, 2006 04:33 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I shoot gym sports quite a bit using the 85mm f/1.8 and the 100mm f/2. Both are great when shot two stops from wide open. I use AI Servo and center point focus for all my sports shots. It just takes patience and practice to get the focusing down in situations with fast action. The Digital Rebel's autofocus is also a bit slow for sports so you need to work on timing to compensate.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmigl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
189 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Sep 08, 2006 07:06 |  #6

Thanks for the tips and information - I had a hunch that it might somewhat be my equipment. I'll just have to practice some more, but fortunately this might be an excuse to upgrade to the 1.4 or 85 (hehehe...)


Canon Digital Rebel XT (Silver) | 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Kit lens | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 | 85mm f/1.8 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheSteveMadden
Goldmember
Avatar
1,229 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Florida
     
Sep 08, 2006 15:36 |  #7

If the focus point wanders for just an instant, it WILL latch onto the contrasty background. I've learned to "see" the AI Servo focus plane and hold off when focus wanders.

liza wrote:
I shoot gym sports quite a bit using the 85mm f/1.8 and the 100mm f/2. Both are great when shot two stops from wide open.

Liza, when you say two stops, do you really mean that or did you mean two clicks (2/3 of a stop) Two stops would be f/3.5 or f/4 with those lenses, wouldn't it. Maybe my definition of stop is wrong ???


Steve
Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 30D, XT, EF 24-70 f/2.8L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, other EF lenses, 430EX, several 580EX II's, Pocket Wizard Plus II's, lighting supports and modifiers, etc etc etc
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Sep 08, 2006 15:41 as a reply to  @ TheSteveMadden's post |  #8

TheSteveMadden wrote:
Liza, when you say two stops, do you really mean that or did you mean two clicks (2/3 of a stop) Two stops would be f/3.5 or f/4 with those lenses, wouldn't it. Maybe my definition of stop is wrong ???

I was thinking the same thing. I always here about how bad gym lighting is and how you need a fast lens for this environment, but shooting at f/4 could be done with a lot of lenses. Perhaps just a slip of the ol' typing fingers.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gary_Evans
Senior Member
Avatar
859 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Norfolk, England
     
Sep 08, 2006 15:48 as a reply to  @ In2Photos's post |  #9

Why not manually focus? Most of my togs prefer to work this way.

IMO, you'd be better off spending your money on a faster focussing body, before you spend on an L series lens.


Gary
www.myeventphoto.co.uk (external link)
www.garyevansphotograp​hy.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Reynolds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,412 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
     
Sep 08, 2006 16:12 |  #10

this looks like your POF (Point of Focus) was set on the big whistle blower in the center of your photo. Use the little red focus dot in your viewfinder and your POF will be where you tell it to be.


a special thanks to the Big Guy upstairs

http://mikereynoldsmot​orsports.com/ (external link)

my gear
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2211782&pos​tcount=289

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symes
Goldmember
Avatar
3,372 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 08, 2006 16:25 |  #11

in a dark setting like that gym the 50mm 1.8 is tough but the 85mm 1.8 I hear is dynamite...

I work alot in the gym's around campus and as other shave pointed out...first you haven't nailed the focus...second you have a slow focusing lens especially in low light...

you certainly need a new lense for that type of photography...unless you prefocus to a point and wait


Symes
Symplicity Photography (external link) Symplicity Glamour (external link)
5D Mark II; 1D Mark II; 17-40L; 24-70 2.8L; 70-200 IS 2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidmigl
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
189 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Sep 08, 2006 18:23 |  #12

Cool, thanks for the interesting tips... What lens/body is preferred for indoor volleyball/basketball?

I assume that the 50mm 1.4's USM autofocus would leave my current lens' autofocus in the dust? And that the 85mm 1.8 would be just as fast as the 50 1.4 when it comes to focusing, while adding some needed focal length for v-ball and b-ball? Right? (Can't you tell I teetering on the brink of a decision lol...)


Canon Digital Rebel XT (Silver) | 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Kit lens | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 | 85mm f/1.8 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symes
Goldmember
Avatar
3,372 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 08, 2006 18:32 as a reply to  @ davidmigl's post |  #13

davidmigl wrote:
Cool, thanks for the interesting tips... What lens/body is preferred for indoor volleyball/basketball?

I assume that the 50mm 1.4's USM autofocus would leave my current lens' autofocus in the dust? And that the 85mm 1.8 would be just as fast as the 50 1.4 when it comes to focusing, while adding some needed focal length for v-ball and b-ball? Right? (Can't you tell I teetering on the brink of a decision lol...)

actually the 85 1.8 is much faster to focus...even faster than the 1.2 L by most accounts...

Cheers,


Symes
Symplicity Photography (external link) Symplicity Glamour (external link)
5D Mark II; 1D Mark II; 17-40L; 24-70 2.8L; 70-200 IS 2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Sep 09, 2006 12:27 as a reply to  @ TheSteveMadden's post |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

TheSteveMadden wrote:
Liza, when you say two stops, do you really mean that or did you mean two clicks (2/3 of a stop) Two stops would be f/3.5 or f/4 with those lenses, wouldn't it. Maybe my definition of stop is wrong ???

Two clicks.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Sep 10, 2006 16:10 |  #15

Two clicks is 2/3 stop - not two stops. Those sort of apertures would make sense to me.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,455 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Blurry subject, sharp background in V-ball - HELP!!!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1704 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.