ok so what focal length on a 1.6 crop factor aka the xti what focal length is the same as the human eye
such as if you were to have both eyes open one on the eye piece and one not when would it be the same
BradT0517 I almost caught fire 3,010 posts Joined Aug 2006 More info | Sep 09, 2006 11:02 | #1 ok so what focal length on a 1.6 crop factor aka the xti what focal length is the same as the human eye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 09, 2006 11:06 | #2 approx 35mm in focal length. Eye piece and eye will only "match up" if you get 100 view from your viewfinder. Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi 9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | Sep 09, 2006 11:11 | #3 Actually the 50mm FOV = human FOV is totally inaccurate. Barrie and ljfinger are correct, see this http://forums.dpreview.com …rum=1018&message=17075832
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 09, 2006 11:13 | #4 the world is FLAT!! I think it is safe to say, that at one time, before fstopjojo hit the planet, the 50mm FOV was considered human eye FOV. Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi 9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | Dante King wrote: the world is FLAT!! I think it is safe to say, that at one time, before fstopjojo hit the planet, the 50mm FOV was considered human eye FOV. Sorry Dante, I don't get this response. Is it a rebuttal to the argument in the link?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
etaf Goldmember 1,224 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Wittering , West Sussex More info | Sep 09, 2006 11:42 | #6 i have seen somewhere between 35 and 50mm - so on a 1.6 crop factor - you need - 22 to 32mm 60D | EF-S 18-200 | 50mm 2.5 macro | 550EX | Pro1 | Elements
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | fStopJojo wrote: Sorry Dante, I don't get this response. Is it a rebuttal to the argument in the link? No no, just a lame attempt at humor. I can NOT rebut that argument. I cant even read half those big words. Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LightRules Return of the Jedi 9,911 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 More info | Dante King wrote: No no, just a lame attempt at humor. I can NOT rebut that argument. I cant even read half those big words. Cheers Dante. It's definitely an interesting read, and it helped clarify some of my own thoughts on the issue, along with some other good reads on the matter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
etaf wrote: what are you trying to achive. nothing i was just wondering because before i reas 50 but i thought the potn people would know
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 09, 2006 13:20 | #10 Look...I won't be arguing, but take a look around with your eyes. Look at something. Figure out how big the portion of that image that is in reasonable focus is. Now..take your camera. On average, on a 1.6x camera, at 30-35mm lens will show just about exactly that portion of the image. The magnification is almost exact, as nothing appears to change from changing between the viewfinder and your "naked eye". Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aero145 Senior Member 909 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Germany More info | Sep 09, 2006 13:49 | #11 I see furhter whith my eyes than my 17-85mm lens on 85mm on a 1.6 crop body. I'm amazed! EOS 5D Mark II | EF24-105 f/4L IS | EF100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | EF200 f/2.8L II | 580EX | Manfrotto 055xProB + 808RC4, and 679B
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 09, 2006 14:02 | #12 I never really got the whole "normal" argument. Why would that lens be better than any other? I think you should choose a lens based on what you want to shoot and how you want to portray what you're shooting. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chtgrubbs Goldmember 1,675 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Sep 09, 2006 15:06 | #13 For my vision, I have always found a 35mm lens on film to be the most natural looking perspective and field of view. On an APS size sensor that translates into 22mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Mark_Cohran wrote: I never really got the whole "normal" argument. Why would that lens be better than any other? I think you should choose a lens based on what you want to shoot and how you want to portray what you're shooting. Mark I'm just answering about what the FOV was...not what lens is better for what. Whether one lens is "better" than another is very much a subjective matter. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 09, 2006 16:57 | #15 BradT0517 wrote: ok so what focal length on a 1.6 crop factor aka the xti what focal length is the same as the human eye such as if you were to have both eyes open one on the eye piece and one not when would it be the same If you're asking what the "normal" lens focal length for an APS-C camera is, the answer is approximately 31mm. The "normal" lens for a 35mm film (24x36mm frame) camera is approximately 50mm. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2573 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||