Got this purely by luck. Back when I was using the 75-300mm. I can't believe the difference in CA levels between the 100-400mm and the 75-300mm.
gregster Senior Member 395 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Sep 12, 2006 10:04 | #1 Got this purely by luck. Back when I was using the 75-300mm. I can't believe the difference in CA levels between the 100-400mm and the 75-300mm. R5 | RF14-35 - RF24-105 - RF100-500 - EF600II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EdRotberg Senior Member 620 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2003 Location: Nevada City, CA. USA More info | Sep 12, 2006 15:34 | #2 Greg, Ed Rotberg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2006 15:46 | #3 Yes, I would agree, but at the time I only had the 75-300mm and onboard flash. Sometimes these things happen so quickly you don't even think of it, and just have time to get the shot. R5 | RF14-35 - RF24-105 - RF100-500 - EF600II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2239 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||