I can get an 70-200 2.8L for a good price (800,00 euro).
Should i go for the deal and sell the 70-200 4L. Or wait
for a 70-200 4L Is?
Overkill Goldmember 1,062 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Amsterdam Netherlands More info | Sep 12, 2006 12:47 | #1 I can get an 70-200 2.8L for a good price (800,00 euro). Canon EOS 40D Gripped / 20D Gripped, EF 70-200 2.8L, [COLOR=black]EF 100-400 IS USM L, EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM, EF-S 10-22 USM, Sigma 105mm 2.8 EX Macro, Kenko 2XTC DG Kenko 1.4TC DG, Kenko Extension Tubes DG 12-20, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto Tripod!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Sep 12, 2006 12:53 | #2 if you dont mind the added wieght, and want the 2.8 app. go for it. Way i see it id rather have 2.8 and no IS and stop action, then F4 and IS and not stop action. what do you plan on shooting though? because if you dont think you would ever use 2.8, or dont want the added wieght then you might want to wait. cetainly neither decision would be a bad one Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys wrote: if you dont mind the added wieght, and want the 2.8 app. go for it. Way i see it id rather have 2.8 and no IS and stop action, then F4 and IS and not stop action. what do you plan on shooting though? because if you dont think you would ever use 2.8, or dont want the added wieght then you might want to wait. cetainly neither decision would be a bad one I used the 70-200 4L for quit a while.... Canon EOS 40D Gripped / 20D Gripped, EF 70-200 2.8L, [COLOR=black]EF 100-400 IS USM L, EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM, EF-S 10-22 USM, Sigma 105mm 2.8 EX Macro, Kenko 2XTC DG Kenko 1.4TC DG, Kenko Extension Tubes DG 12-20, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto Tripod!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Sep 12, 2006 13:03 | #4 well, IS will stop camera shake but it wont do a thing for stopping action for action you need to get a higher shutter speed, and therefore needed a lower appeture. Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2006 13:06 | #5 I will go for the 70-200 2.8! Thanks Canon EOS 40D Gripped / 20D Gripped, EF 70-200 2.8L, [COLOR=black]EF 100-400 IS USM L, EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM, EF-S 10-22 USM, Sigma 105mm 2.8 EX Macro, Kenko 2XTC DG Kenko 1.4TC DG, Kenko Extension Tubes DG 12-20, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto Tripod!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity 10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Overkill wrote: I used the 70-200 4L for quit a while.... I recently went to the zoo in Cloudy conditions and found the amount of pics that i could shoot (with no tripod) was very low. Lots of pictures were impos because the animals moved to fast or their was to little light to take the pic's without the Mono or Tripod! Higher iso. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2876 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||