Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 13 Sep 2006 (Wednesday) 03:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

300D: what's wrong with my RAW shots?

 
a_dee
Member
106 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Sep 13, 2006 03:01 |  #1

I was investigating my dead pixel problem and had done the tests with the lens cap and viewfinder cap on and took pictures in JPG mode. The results were normal and got the black screen with a few dead/stuck/hot pixels. I then decided to try in RAW, and this was what I got after reading the file in Elements 3.0. All the shots ISO100, even up to 1/4000s were the same. When I take a "normal" picture in RAW, it seems normal, i.e. there's no obvious noise like the black shots.

http://www.plprohome.c​om/public/crw_1723.jpg (external link)


6D . SL1
EF-S 24mm f/2.8 . 40mm f/2.8 . 85mm f/1.8 . 70-200mm f/4L IS
Speedlite 430EX . Kenko 1.4x Pro 300DG . Kenko Extension Tube Set
Gone for Now: 5D3 . Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 . 20mm f/2.8 . 35mm f/1.4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bidimagic
Member
219 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Milano, Italy
     
Sep 13, 2006 03:29 |  #2

The noise in this picture seems normal to me, as long as with the cap on
the image is obviously strongly underexposed so a big amount of noise is generated.
I don't know why it is not present in jpeg image, maybe because the
in-camera compression could reduce that ?
Or, maybe you see the noise in the raw file because the raw conversion
software (ACR or whatever you use) adds by default a lot of brigthness
causing the noise to be more visible.


Marco

5D shooter (Gear list)
Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeeJay
Goldmember
Avatar
3,834 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Warwickshire - UK
     
Sep 13, 2006 03:37 |  #3

I would stick this image on ebay, someones bound to bid for it!


1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea :confused:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Sep 13, 2006 04:02 |  #4

Great piece of modern art. It should be in Critique Corner, not here.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
Avatar
4,365 posts
Likes: 13
Joined May 2006
Location: 'Straya
     
Sep 13, 2006 07:47 |  #5

Maybe I can be a little more helpful than these kind souls.

Photoshop defaults the exposure settings to very high with RAW pictures.
See this thread: I had the same issue with moon shots I took.
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=181952

The answers there should help you.
If your problem is th same, it's easily fixed. Hope that helps :)


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Sep 13, 2006 11:06 |  #6

Nice one Adam. That must be the reason. I had no idea whatsoever. But still - it is a great piece of modern art! :-)


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
That_Guy
Member
40 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Sep 13, 2006 11:22 |  #7

As bidimagic said. Even without the lense cap underexposing alot will give that result.
photosites don't have time to stabilize and va-la noise.

Try the same thing with about 1 sec or so exposure and see if it doesn't clean up alittle.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
a_dee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
106 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Sep 13, 2006 14:14 |  #8

thanks for the help guys! adobe's raw convertor was automatically bumping up the exposure to +4 causing the noise.. after setting it back to 0, it seems normal again.


6D . SL1
EF-S 24mm f/2.8 . 40mm f/2.8 . 85mm f/1.8 . 70-200mm f/4L IS
Speedlite 430EX . Kenko 1.4x Pro 300DG . Kenko Extension Tube Set
Gone for Now: 5D3 . Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 . 20mm f/2.8 . 35mm f/1.4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamJL
Goldmember
Avatar
4,365 posts
Likes: 13
Joined May 2006
Location: 'Straya
     
Sep 13, 2006 14:52 |  #9

+10 for Adam :D


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,643 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
300D: what's wrong with my RAW shots?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1296 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.