Sounds like an awesome plan to me. Either that or one more option would be to sell the 70-200 F/4 and just get the 100-400 or Bigma for now and live without a fast telephoto for awhile?
Dorman Goldmember 4,661 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Halifax, NS More info | Sep 14, 2006 11:23 | #16 Sounds like an awesome plan to me. Either that or one more option would be to sell the 70-200 F/4 and just get the 100-400 or Bigma for now and live without a fast telephoto for awhile?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
na..I like my 70-200 to much....its a nice range and soo light and the IQ is top notch even wide open My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2876 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||