Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 Sep 2006 (Wednesday) 18:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L...

 
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Sep 14, 2006 18:47 as a reply to  @ post 1986229 |  #31

Ronald S. Jr. wrote:
Everyone else just seemed to do it, so what the hell.

Yeah, and tomorrow we are jumping off the Geo. Washington Bridge!!!!


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Sep 14, 2006 18:51 as a reply to  @ post 1986960 |  #32

cjm wrote:
Its a pure ego lens (like the f1) most people who will buy this lens will have no real business needing it over the 50mm f1.4 and wont be able to take any better pictures with it either.

I think you are so very wrong. Confused too. We all know that the 50 1.8 takes as good pictures as the 50 1.4. It never misses focus, has FTMF, USM and the bokeh is some of the best I have ever seen.

From a strict DOF control point, the 50 1.2 will be BETTER than the 1.4. More control. As an artist, that is important to me. Time will prove the worth of this new lens from canon.


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Sep 15, 2006 09:15 |  #33

I'm sure the new 50mm EF lineup won't be any different than the old FD lineup...

The 1.8's are great entry-level lenses. Not expensive (used to come on every body) and very sharp. The 1.4's were the "reference lens" for color and sharpness, the best 50mm version Canon made. Then you had the 1.2 and 1.2L - and while they were brighter (one having aspherical elements and thus an L), they suffered on sharpness wide open.

So yeah, you get the 1.2 - but it's just not as sharp wide open as either the 1.4 or 1.8.

This is true on most lenses. There's a sweet spot in the design and it's not necessarily the brightest version. You usually have to use exotic elements and a more complicated design to get around distortion, flare, etc. which hurts image quality.

That all being said, I see the 1.2L being somewhat popular, but the 1.4 isn't going anywhere.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Sep 15, 2006 09:40 |  #34

I would be supremely let down if the 1.2 wasn't as sharp wide open as the 1.4, because the few 1.4's that I've owned were basically crap at 1.4.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Sep 15, 2006 10:42 as a reply to  @ Ronald S. Jr.'s post |  #35

Ronald S. Jr. wrote:
basically crap at 1.4.

I was not impressed with mine at 1.4 either. I found myself shooting at 2.0 and having decent results... But I sold the lens because I was just not using it enough...


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
incendy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County
     
Sep 15, 2006 10:45 |  #36

The 1.4 has no contrast. I can't wait for the L! Like I said for indoor events like Christmas, this is going to be the altimate lens I think especially on a full frame:)


Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/incendy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hef
Goldmember
Avatar
1,169 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Western New York
     
Sep 15, 2006 13:56 |  #37

I will be definately getting this lens. I had an older Nikkor 55 noct 1.2 and i can tell you that i regret selling it. The bokeh was unbelievable. I just recently got the Nikkor 85 f/1.4 AF lens and now i know what it must be like to have the EF 85mm f/1.2... whew! what a beauty.


Nikon D3, Leica M8,Leica D-Lux 4
Complete GEAR LIST
http://www.photosbyhow​ie.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Big ­ WIll
"Slight breach of etiquette"
Avatar
2,363 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Chester & Bucks UK
     
Sep 15, 2006 14:02 |  #38

This may help - http://www.luminous-landscape.com …cameras/rebel%2​0xti.shtml (external link)

At the bottom it has small review of 50mm


Computers blur the boundaries... We are being released from the suddenness of photography, the suddenness of the shutterhttp://www.photography​-on-the.net …p?p=1606920&pos​tcount=132

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AeroSmith
Goldmember
Avatar
4,600 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 536
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida
     
Sep 15, 2006 14:35 as a reply to  @ Big WIll's post |  #39

Big WIll wrote:
This may help - http://www.luminous-landscape.com …cameras/rebel%2​0xti.shtml (external link)

At the bottom it has small review of 50mm

That lens looks comical on an XTi. Would probably look more at home on a 1D.


Josh Smith

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TimothyHughes
Member
Avatar
128 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Madison, USA
     
Sep 15, 2006 15:00 as a reply to  @ Big WIll's post |  #40

Big WIll wrote:
This may help - http://www.luminous-landscape.com …cameras/rebel%2​0xti.shtml (external link)

At the bottom it has small review of 50mm

He shot the test shot at f/4.0. Probably could have just used a nifty 50 for that sample image! :lol:


Gear: Canon 5D, 50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.8, 35mm f/2.0, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 70-200 f/4.0L, circular polarizers, ext. tubes, 550EX, some hotlights, a few AlienBees, modifiers, etc. http://www.th-photo.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,158 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2881 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.