Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 11 Dec 2003 (Thursday) 22:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

airport x-ray and digital photography

 
u02bnpx
Member
174 posts
Joined Apr 2002
     
Dec 11, 2003 22:00 |  #1

I've been reading conflicting suggestions re the topic of passing digital cameras and image storage cards through either belt-line x-ray or the "big daddy" x-ray used to clear unzipped luggage. I know the latter is stronger than the former, and anything beyond your socks and shorts will likely end up either fried or stolen.

I ordinarily have my camera hand inspected. I also have used or unused film cartridges hand inspected. Should I do the same with my compact flash cards--either with or without data on them? Or can I leave them along with my lenses in my camera bag, which I place on the belt?

I've tried calling my local airport with the question, but the answers are always too pat--"of course we wouldn't ruin your pictures!" But I've heard enough horror stories to keep my paranoia level high.

Any advice...based on more than hunch? I've got until late January before I take off for Sedona and points west.

Floyd




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,098 posts
Gallery: 127 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 449
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Switzerland
     
Dec 12, 2003 07:04 |  #2

I've flown quite a bit with camera and CF cards and never had any problems, though that doesn't mean nothing can happen.

One thing you can do is leave your card in the camera where it is a bit more shielded. I'll be taking a 40GB storage/viewer gizmo for my next trip, so I am hoping its case will give good shielding too.

Forget what they are called, but there are also shielded bags for film and cards, I think from B&H Photo and OPTECH/USA.


Canon : EOS R : 5DIV : 5DS R : 5DIII : 7DII : 40 2.8 : 50 1.4 : 35L : 85L : 100L IS Macro : 135L : 16-35L II : RF-24-105L IS : 70-200L II : 100-400L IS II : 1.4x & 2x TC III : 600EX-RT : 580EX : 430EX : G1XII : Markins Q10 & Q3T : Jobu Gimbal : Manfrotto Underware : etc...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ikinaa
Goldmember
Avatar
1,517 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Luxembourg
     
Dec 12, 2003 07:12 |  #3

In november i had 3 business-flights (to and from) in 3 weeks (6 times x-ray)
Always took my G3 and CF-cards with.
It passed the small-luggage x-ray without problem.

As for the shielded bags... I guess that when the customs see a black box through the x-rays in your luggage, they'll begin to bother you, open all boxes, etc, and fingering your gear do perhaps more damage than the x-ray...


www.ikinaa.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
Dec 12, 2003 07:30 |  #4

Compact flash cards are something entirely different than photographic film. Compact flash cards are not sensitive to light or mild X-ray radiation, so airport X-ray machines will not have any effect on CF cards at all. Not even the stronger kind of X-ray machines.


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ikinaa
Goldmember
Avatar
1,517 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Luxembourg
     
Dec 12, 2003 07:33 |  #5

Jesper wrote:
Compact flash cards are something entirely different than photographic film. Compact flash cards are not sensitive to light or mild X-ray radiation, so airport X-ray machines will not have any effect on CF cards at all. Not even the stronger kind of X-ray machines.

I'm not in electronics, so here's a question:
the data on a compact flash card is stored how? magnetically, electronic state, or how? Doesn't a high energy ray (like x-ray) modify such a state?


www.ikinaa.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Dec 12, 2003 09:25 |  #6

I fly an inordinate amount. I have never had a problem with either the compact flash cards or the film. Mind you I never have film long enough for it to be xrayed several times.

Here is a link to the website for the government agency in Canada that is responsible for airport security.

http://www.catsa.ca/en​glish/travel_voyage/ba​g.htm (external link)
(You have click on camera film about a third of the page down)

They say xraying won't affect anything under ISO800 but several xrays on the same file could provide issues. No issue with flash cards

Sheldon


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
Dec 12, 2003 14:53 |  #7

Ikinaa wrote:
Jesper wrote:
Compact flash cards are something entirely different than photographic film. Compact flash cards are not sensitive to light or mild X-ray radiation, so airport X-ray machines will not have any effect on CF cards at all. Not even the stronger kind of X-ray machines.

I'm not in electronics, so here's a question:
the data on a compact flash card is stored how? magnetically, electronic state, or how? Doesn't a high energy ray (like x-ray) modify such a state?

It is stored in electronic circuits made up of microscopic transistors as electric charges. X-ray radiation isn't so strong that it can change these electric charges.

(By the way, I am an electronics engineer....)


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IndyJeff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,892 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     
Dec 12, 2003 16:03 |  #8

Jesper wrote:

It is stored in electronic circuits made up of microscopic transistors as electric charges. X-ray radiation isn't so strong that it can change these electric charges.

(By the way, I am an electronics engineer....)


Or do you just play one on TV?


On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pradeep1
Goldmember
Avatar
2,365 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Sep 2003
Location: USA
     
Dec 12, 2003 18:30 |  #9

X-rays affect film, not Compact Flash cards or digicams. Don't worry, fly happily.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
u02bnpx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
174 posts
Joined Apr 2002
     
Dec 13, 2003 20:44 |  #10

pradeep1 wrote:
X-rays affect film, not Compact Flash cards or digicams. Don't worry, fly happily.

This would seem to be the majority opinion, so I'd like to thank those who responded. I will, however, continue to keep valuable photo gear of any kind out of my large bag, which gets the "heavy dose" of rays. And I'll do so also to protect the gear--especially from theft.

Incidentally, for those who do fly with film (either exposed or unexposed), I've learned that despite what the people at the belt may say, you DO NOT have to place the film on the belt. As of this writing anyway, you have a legal right to request and receive a hand check.

Floyd




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
Dec 15, 2003 10:32 |  #11

IndyJeff wrote:
Jesper wrote:
It is stored in electronic circuits made up of microscopic transistors as electric charges. X-ray radiation isn't so strong that it can change these electric charges.

(By the way, I am an electronics engineer....)

Or do you just play one on TV?

I studied EE but I'm a software engineer now...


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Dec 15, 2003 12:20 |  #12

Just a note:
I have heard from someone that Dayton, Ohio's new airport scanners are using he newer technologies that apparently can damage hardrives and even solid state storage (such as CF cards).

I have trouble believing it, but I know it is theoretically possible with some of the newer scanners.

The person who mentioned it to me is a frequent traveller out of Dayton and should know what he was talking about. He also mentioned they have signs telling you this. Lastly, it is possible he was pulling my leg, but this was aperson who was not likely to do so.

Anyway thought I would mention this for people traveling through Dayton. I have heard of no other airports in the US using these scanners yet, but have heard of some outside the US.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pradeep1
Goldmember
Avatar
2,365 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Sep 2003
Location: USA
     
Dec 18, 2003 19:32 |  #13

Longwatcher wrote:
Just a note:
I have heard from someone that Dayton, Ohio's new airport scanners are using he newer technologies that apparently can damage hardrives and even solid state storage (such as CF cards).

I have trouble believing it, but I know it is theoretically possible with some of the newer scanners.

The person who mentioned it to me is a frequent traveller out of Dayton and should know what he was talking about. He also mentioned they have signs telling you this. Lastly, it is possible he was pulling my leg, but this was aperson who was not likely to do so.

Ask him to take a picture of the sign and send it to you for "verification". I agree with u02bnpx that one should carry your valuables with you in the carryon instead of placing in luggage. The luxury of having your film hand scanned is only reserved to USA and maybe a few westernized countries. You won't be ask lucky in other places.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,142 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
airport x-ray and digital photography
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1745 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.