Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 15 Sep 2006 (Friday) 18:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

350d body and kit lens, or just the body? What's best?

 
elise1030
Senior Member
569 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
     
Sep 15, 2006 18:49 |  #1

If I were to buy a 350D for my first DSLR, would I be best to buy the lenskit(that has the 18-55mm) or just the body and buy a separate lens? If so which lens would you reccommend me to buy? I would like an all-rounder that takes good portraits and some still life of flowers etc. Is there such a thing as a versitile lens for most situations?


~350d -- kitlens -- ef 75-300mm -- A610~ 'thank you John'

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/elise1030/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
Avatar
3,860 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Sep 15, 2006 18:57 |  #2

For the money, the kit lens really can't be beat. Check out my website. Most of those pics were taken with the kit lens.


Steve Lexa
Iowa City Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Sep 15, 2006 19:01 |  #3

I also have a lot of decent shots from the kit lens. I think it's a great all around lens to start with and will guide you into what you really want in a lens later on. If you are really against that lens, than look at the 17-50 2.8 sigma or tamron, both excellent from I what I see here.


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xepherys
Senior Member
Avatar
807 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: 17TLH2445607250
     
Sep 15, 2006 19:04 |  #4

In all honesty, while it might be "great for the price", it's really not a very good lens. I got the EF 85mm f1.8 and it's almost never off my camera. Yeah, it's longish on a 1.6xCF body, and yeah, it has no zoom... but even this relatively inexpensive lens takes MUCH MUCH higher quality pictures than the 18-55 does. It's how I first learned that glass really DOES make a huge difference.

I guess it depends on your budget and what you want to shoot, really...


My Gear: EOS 7D .|. EF 85/1.8 .-. EF 24/2.8 .-. EF 70-200/4L .-. EF 24-70/2.8L .|. 580EX-II
Website: www.jswilliamsphotogra​phy.com (external link) Blog: blog.jswilliamsphotogr​aphy.com

Zenfolio Referal Code: TFY-NTD-77Z

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Sep 15, 2006 19:22 as a reply to  @ xepherys's post |  #5

xepherys wrote:
I guess it depends on your budget and what you want to shoot, really...

those are the keywords! :D


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Sep 15, 2006 19:43 |  #6

Unless you have very deep pockets and want to spend alot of money for your first lens, that is more then the camera itself, then the look at the 24-70f/2.8L for a walk around lens. Otherwise stick w/ the kit lens for about $50. Remember it is not what you use but how you use it that count.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Sep 15, 2006 20:15 |  #7

body and Sigma 17-70


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Sep 16, 2006 04:23 as a reply to  @ lostdoggy's post |  #8

lostdoggy wrote:
Unless you have very deep pockets and want to spend alot of money for your first lens, that is more then the camera itself, then the look at the 24-70f/2.8L for a walk around lens. Otherwise stick w/ the kit lens for about $50. Remember it is not what you use but how you use it that count.

This sounds funny the way you've written it :D
-Either get the cheapo kit lens or spend a fortune on the best there is -and ignore anything in between

More seriously -
Elise ,the kit lens is a bargain for what it does.Other lenses do better but they cost a whole lot more.
Even the 'next step up' lens the sigma 17-70- costs a huge amount compared to the kit lens.

Really, it is tricky recommending a lens to someone .The reason is that different people have wildly different expectations.
Probably the smartest way to go about it si to buy the kit lens AND the 50/1.8. You will want the 50/1.8 sometime anyway;) and it's a great lens for showing what the more expensive zoom are capable of :D. It will help you decide wether you want to buy better quality zooms




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
red ­ hot ­ sheep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,576 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: London
     
Sep 16, 2006 04:49 as a reply to  @ ron chappel's post |  #9

Get it with the kit lens. It's actually very capable if used correctly. Check out this thread:

http://www.photography​-on-the.net …light=18-55mm+kit+archive

Also nearly all the photos in my gallery were taken with the kit lens.

Francis


My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RyanHutchinson
Senior Member
331 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Sep 16, 2006 08:14 |  #10

if you ar new to slr get the kit lens, if not buy something like the 17-40 F4L.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elise1030
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
569 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
     
Sep 16, 2006 08:47 |  #11

Thank you to all that responded, I will keep all things mentioned in consideration as I journey along my research whilst saving my money.

Thank you red hot sheep for posting that! Some of those are magificent photos which have totally changed my view on the lens kit. It appears to do everything that I'd want it to do to start off with.


~350d -- kitlens -- ef 75-300mm -- A610~ 'thank you John'

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/elise1030/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,444 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
350d body and kit lens, or just the body? What's best?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2790 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.