Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Sep 2006 (Saturday) 19:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon Teleconverter 2.0, yes or no?

 
AzFlier
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Sep 18, 2006 22:41 as a reply to  @ post 1998292 |  #16

Thanks for your thoughts.
I ordered a Kenko 1.4 today, the pro version. It saved about $100 over the Canon.
I figured it would be worth giving it a try.

Thanks to everyone for all the help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blue_max
Goldmember
Avatar
2,622 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: London UK
     
Sep 19, 2006 00:56 as a reply to  @ AzFlier's post |  #17

I don't think it's that the 2x converters are optically bad, just that adding two stops to a longish lens is starting to push the limits of hand-holdability. It's certainly a lot easier to carry a 2x converter rather than another lens, so you are more likely to have it with you when out and about.

Graham


.
Lamb dressed as mutton.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Salleke
Goldmember
2,201 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Belgium
     
Sep 19, 2006 04:04 as a reply to  @ post 1998292 |  #18

Personally I will never use a 2 X convertor. The image quality suffers to much IMO.

Good luck.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Sep 19, 2006 06:39 |  #19

These pictures were taken at 400mm with the Kenko 2x on my 70-200mm

The image quality isn't as awful as people imply, but it takes a fair bit of PP to get the best out of them...

http://i13.photobucket​.com …cotland-2006/IMG_1832.jpg (external link)
http://i13.photobucket​.com …cotland-2006/IMG_1543.jpg (external link)

The reach it gives you is very good though

From this (70mm)

IMAGE: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a294/peteghia/Scotland-2006/IMG_1568.jpg

To this (400mm)
IMAGE: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a294/peteghia/Scotland-2006/IMG_1655.jpg

Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,272 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Canon Teleconverter 2.0, yes or no?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2788 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.