Thanks for your thoughts.
I ordered a Kenko 1.4 today, the pro version. It saved about $100 over the Canon.
I figured it would be worth giving it a try.
Thanks to everyone for all the help.
Thanks for your thoughts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blue_max Goldmember 2,622 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: London UK More info | I don't think it's that the 2x converters are optically bad, just that adding two stops to a longish lens is starting to push the limits of hand-holdability. It's certainly a lot easier to carry a 2x converter rather than another lens, so you are more likely to have it with you when out and about. .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Salleke Goldmember 2,201 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Belgium More info | Personally I will never use a 2 X convertor. The image quality suffers to much IMO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back.... 38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Sep 19, 2006 06:39 | #19 These pictures were taken at 400mm with the Kenko 2x on my 70-200mm To this (400mm)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2788 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||