Keiffer Goldmember  2,259 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Orlando Fl. More info | Sep 16, 2006 22:37 | #1 I seen this said in another thread and no one disputed it, Just wondering is this true? The poster said because the camera doesn't have to spend time calculating aperture/shutter sppeds.that Af is faster. Never heard of this before, but than again I don't shoot in Manual that often.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crashoran Goldmember  1,734 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Austin,Texas More info | Sep 16, 2006 22:50 | #2 I usually get more keepers shooting in manual but I don't know if it really makes a difference to AF
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark_Cohran Cream of the Crop  More info | Sep 16, 2006 23:11 | #3 Never noticed much difference myself. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHardcard Senior Member 578 posts Joined Jun 2005 More info | Well, I would disagree as to the reason. I don't think the time it takes modern silicon to run the algorithms necessary is humany perceptible. Sweet new gear for a photogenic new year!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1049 guests, 107 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
