I just got my new ef24-70. I am very disappointed with the quality of the pic i shot with it. So disappointed that I have use it to compare the EF 18-55 which comes with my 30D. I compared at 50mm with f5 and f10 and all pictures took on a tripod. When I looked at the pictures at computer, I could not see the difference if I did not looked at the file name. They are identica, at least to me.
Anyone has any idea why this 12 times expensive, much larger and heavier lens produce the similar quanlity as the much cheaper, smaller and lighter lens?
Have I got a wrong sample of 24-70?
Thanks
Not sure how you are testing but the best way to see differences are with flat high contrast targets, try using newsprint taped on the wall if you not doing so already. AF has some statistical variation so throw the focus off and re-AF say three times and use the sharpest of each case.
The kit lens is at its worst at 50mm so you should be able to see a difference. Differences will be greater in the corners. Don't have a 24-70 but here is a 50mm prime comparison.
Centre Crop of kit lens 55mm f8
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Centre Crop ef 50mm f1.4 @ f8
Corner Crop of kit lens 55mm f8
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Corner Crop ef 50mm f1.4 @ f8






