Guys, I really need your valued and expert opinion here...
If possible, I'd like for one of the die-hard users here to launch Picasa (if you have it). For the life of me I sware Picasa not only reads BUT allows you to EDIT RAW files on-the-fly prior to converting / or expoting as they term it. (I could be wrong).
For example, here are two images I worked on which were shot exclusively in RAW and edited using Picasa:
Original RAW file ...
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
Edited on-the-fly using Picasa THEN exported to JPG (TIFF export is also available)...
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
In this conversion (2nd image) I did all corrections BEFORE exporting to JPG in a sub-directory.
That being said, is it possible all adjustments are being made to the RAW file (same as RSP and the other fine converters out there) BEFORE exporting?
When I view the RAW images in Picasa the file size (shown on the bottom of the file in Picasa) is a whopping 3520x2346 for 7.5MP in size. The highest setting in JPG has NEVER been that high -- thus I assume I must be looking at *AND* editing a RAW file?
Please note Picasa is in no way intended to replace PSCS2 of the other fine converters out there when it comes to pre-printing/sending to the lab. However, I am (and have been) looking for a product which will deliver a LIGHTNING FAST work-flow for the purposes of previewing print orders on the web (small file size). RSP is fast and I love it, but if Picasa is actually allowing me to edit my RAW files THEN export to TIFF or JPG like the others, its work-flow is (IMO) second to NONE.
Anyone familiar with this? If so, I humbly welcome your valued feedback.
Regards,
Dave

), but you got my curiousity up enough about Picasa that I'm presently downloading it. I'll give a RAW file a try after I get it installed.

