Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Sep 2006 (Wednesday) 20:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

OMG Sigma 120-300 2.8

 
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 20:02 |  #1

Ok well I thought about it and I thought I should just get the 100-300 f4 and save some money.
well tonight I was ata Ritz and they had the 120-300 there..WOW...that thing was AWSOME. Guy put it on a 20D for me and I got to play with it....I am DEF getting that lens next. I didnt find it to be heavy at all...It actually felt really nice.


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Sep 20, 2006 20:03 |  #2

Did you notice the # of people in the last month who got a Soft copy?


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 20:06 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #3

thats ok...I will take my chance..I am not getting it till around Feb when tax refund and all. but WOW I wish i could scrounge up the 2100bucks right now.
That thing was awsome...the Zoom ring was tight but I am sure that will loosen up


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Travis ­ F
Goldmember
1,180 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 20, 2006 20:57 as a reply to  @ 05Xrunner's post |  #4

Yeah, don't be scared off by the recent threads. I have one and I am one having issues right now too. But when this lens is on, it is definitely on.

I am chalking alot of my problems up to user error. I think that I just need to relearn how to use AI servo because I have about an even percentage of IF and OOF shots when shooting sports.

I actually tried to run mine through a focus test tonight but I am pretty sure I flubbed that up:confused: . See here - http://www.photography​-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=213860 for details.

Good luck,
Travis


_______________
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonG
Goldmember
Avatar
1,007 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener, ON
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:01 |  #5

gasrocks wrote in post #2014626 (external link)
Did you notice the # of people in the last month who got a Soft copy?

One should not assume that this lens is bad in general simply because there have been a handful of threads on that topic here of late. Remember, the internet is a giant amplifier for negativity, and for every thread here complaining about this lens there are probablly many others who are thrilled with this lens. ;)


-- Michael (a.k.a. SimonG)
EOS 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 40 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.4 | 430EX | Zenfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lensview
Senior Member
Avatar
524 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: NY
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:02 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

05Xrunner wrote in post #2014618 (external link)
Ok well I thought about it and I thought I should just get the 100-300 f4 and save some money.
well tonight I was ata Ritz and they had the 120-300 there..WOW...that thing was AWSOME. Guy put it on a 20D for me and I got to play with it....I am DEF getting that lens next. I didnt find it to be heavy at all...It actually felt really nice.



Oooh mama, how long did you hold it in your hands....?:(


Canon SD600
Sandisk 1Mb ExtraIII SD card

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:05 as a reply to  @ lensview's post |  #7

about 5mins...I was just drolling..and putting it on that 20 and taking some pics..WOW it was awsome..felt soo good in my hands to. i dont see how anyone says its to heavy..it felt perfectly balanced and all...I persoanlyl was expecting it to feel MUCH heavier...I am weird..the heavier the more I like it...I am odd I guess.

yea I am not gonna go by what was it..3 people who posted some bad things...I think that doesnt even equal about .1% of the amount sold


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,720 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:07 |  #8

Would be a great choice over the 100-300


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Website (external link)

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:08 as a reply to  @ calicokat's post |  #9

yes I def see that after holding it...that front element was SOOOOOO big...I coulda put my head in it...LOL


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Travis ­ F
Goldmember
1,180 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:16 |  #10

05Xrunner wrote in post #2014854 (external link)
yea I am not gonna go by what was it..3 people who posted some bad things...I think that doesnt even equal about .1% of the amount sold

Here are some of the shots that I took last week using this lens for the first time for football. And I am having issues ( if that tells you anything).

http://www.photography​-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=218264

This is why I firmly believe my issues are with myself and not the lens (although #1 is a little soft). And why I say when it's on, it's definitely on!

Travis


_______________
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 21:20 as a reply to  @ Travis F's post |  #11

well the one looked pretty good. You might have to get use to it...There where issues of people getting bad copies of the Tamron lens as well but that didnt stray me...I am willing to take a chance and if it takes a week at sigma to get it in perfect...I am willing to do that for such an awsome lens


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 20, 2006 22:13 |  #12

gasrocks wrote in post #2014626 (external link)
Did you notice the # of people in the last month who got a Soft copy?

No kidding! When I purchased my 20D a few months back, it was the first lens I purchased. I was totally shocked at how poor the optics were. So soft I could probably have achieved better results with a $7 disposable camera. When I took it back the sales guy told me the return rate was very high. I haven't purchased a sigma lens since.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 22:20 as a reply to  @ Picture North Carolina's post |  #13

I dont care how many people say there are bad copies...there are MANY more that priase its IQ and everything about it.


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonG
Goldmember
Avatar
1,007 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener, ON
     
Sep 20, 2006 22:25 |  #14

CannedHeat wrote in post #2015230 (external link)
... I haven't purchased a sigma lens since.

Better hope you never have a problem with a Canon product with that attitude. If you do, you might have no chance but to shoot Nikon. ;)


-- Michael (a.k.a. SimonG)
EOS 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 40 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.4 | 430EX | Zenfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2006 22:27 as a reply to  @ SimonG's post |  #15

LOL..i really have no future canon lens I plan on getting...only a canon body and rest is the sigma lens and the tokina 12-24


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,482 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
OMG Sigma 120-300 2.8
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2830 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.