Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Sep 2006 (Wednesday) 20:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

OMG Sigma 120-300 2.8

 
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Sep 21, 2006 10:10 |  #31

lensview wrote in post #2016490 (external link)
Here, here...photographic threads are worthless w/o pictures.:D

Aye, especially for those that hate to read. LOL!


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windoze
Goldmember
Avatar
1,397 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: NY
     
Sep 21, 2006 10:55 |  #32

Travis F wrote in post #2014828 (external link)
Yeah, don't be scared off by the recent threads. I have one and I am one having issues right now too. But when this lens is on, it is definitely on.

I am chalking alot of my problems up to user error. I think that I just need to relearn how to use AI servo because I have about an even percentage of IF and OOF shots when shooting sports.

I actually tried to run mine through a focus test tonight but I am pretty sure I flubbed that up:confused: . See here - http://www.photography​-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=213860 for details.

Good luck,
Travis



I thought mine was soft also but i now know its user error. According to a real smart member on this forum who looked at my "controlled" test image, reports I HAVE A VERY SHARP COPY! Yahoo! So i blame user error on my last images....

troy


Canon 40D
Canon | EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | EF 400 f/5.6L |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jorj7
Goldmember
Avatar
2,048 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 21, 2006 12:46 |  #33

Here's a photo I just posted on another thread:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Sigma 120-300, 274mm, f4.5, 1/1250 sec, ISO 400, AV mode

More photos taken that day with the Sigma 120-300 are at:
http://sis24.berkeley.​edu/view/060426-Birds/ (external link)
Many were taken with the 2x TC, but since I used a Kenko MC4,
it didn't report itself to the camera. I've also used the Kenko
Pro 300, and Tamron MC7 2x TCs with the lens.

George - SF Bay Area- 1D, 1Dmk2, 20D, 60D, 650D, 6D, 7Dmk2
Ls:16-35,24-70,24-105,70-200,100-400,135,300,400,500
Others: 10-22, 17-55IS, 35, 50, 85, 100 Macro
Peleng8;Sigma14,20,18-250,600,800;Tamron17-50,180, Tokina 11-16
http://birds.avianist.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 21, 2006 12:56 as a reply to  @ jorj7's post |  #34

looks nice..that one little bird is standing on a Mimosa tree :) I just planted 2 of those in my yard


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 21, 2006 13:30 as a reply to  @ 05Xrunner's post |  #35

AHHHHH just day dreaming about that lens...Just looking through the viewfinder of that thing was amazing. God I need to pull together that 2grand fast


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C.S.I.
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: New York
     
Sep 21, 2006 14:01 |  #36

Im a big fan of Sigma, have the following listed in my Signature......Unfortu​nately, my 120-300 is not very sharp, probably gonna have to send it in. I have tried 2 copies.....one was sent to me by mistake about a year ago, was extremely sharp......the one that I actually ordered recently is very soft. I keep telling myself that B+H would have tracked me down for the $2400 if I didnt send it back last year :rolleyes:


Canon 40D | Canon 20D | Canon 300D | Canon 18-55 | Canon 50 1.8 | Sigma 10-20 | [FONT=Georgia]Sigma [FONT=Impact]105 | Sigma 70-200 2.8 | Sigma 120-300 2.8 | Tamron 28-75

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 21, 2006 14:27 as a reply to  @ C.S.I.'s post |  #37

WOW u had a 120-300 sent to u by accident...DAMN wish that would happen to me


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C.S.I.
Senior Member
Avatar
506 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: New York
     
Sep 21, 2006 14:54 |  #38

05Xrunner wrote in post #2018216 (external link)
WOW u had a 120-300 sent to u by accident...DAMN wish that would happen to me

What happened was, I requested a quote for several pricey items from 2 major photo vendors. I purchased most of the items on the quote from vendor "A", but the Sigma lens from vendor "B" who had the lens for a substancially lower price. Vendor "A" proceeded to send the lens anyway, so they would have hunted me down for the money, ultimately.....it didnt just misteriously show up on my doorstop (If that was the case, I hope that I would still have the strength to do the right thing and send it back :o ).


Canon 40D | Canon 20D | Canon 300D | Canon 18-55 | Canon 50 1.8 | Sigma 10-20 | [FONT=Georgia]Sigma [FONT=Impact]105 | Sigma 70-200 2.8 | Sigma 120-300 2.8 | Tamron 28-75

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 21, 2006 15:11 |  #39

C.S.I. wrote in post #2018326 (external link)
What happened was, I requested a quote for several pricey items from 2 major photo vendors. I purchased most of the items on the quote from vendor "A", but the Sigma lens from vendor "B" who had the lens for a substancially lower price. Vendor "A" proceeded to send the lens anyway, so they would have hunted me down for the money, ultimately.....it didnt just misteriously show up on my doorstop (If that was the case, I hope that I would still have the strength to do the right thing and send it back :o ).

you would have MUCH more strength then I would if it just SHOWED up at your door just sitting there one day when you got home...Dont think i woulda sent it back anywhere but my camera bag...LOL


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wazza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,627 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
     
Sep 21, 2006 15:15 |  #40

Great shot jorj7.

Funny at 274mm, mine often records as that amount when it's just under 300mm


New Zealand Photography Tours (external link) | Williams Photography - Queenstown Wedding Photography (external link) |
Instagram (external link) | Facebook - Weddings (external link) | Facebook - Landscapes + Tours (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 21, 2006 15:24 |  #41

05Xrunner wrote in post #2016884 (external link)
your dealer must have just been a canon L boy...cause I personally would take them over the canon's lately as getting most bang for my buck

No, quite the opposite. He told me that he doesn't push the canon lenses because they are unprofitable. Apparently canon doesn't have a pricing policy in place that helps the local camera shop stay in business against giants like BH. In fact, I was surprised he admitted that when a customer orders a lens that his distributor doesn't have in stock he orders the lens himself from BH at retail prices and resells it. No, his advice was based on experience. Look, I'm not targeting sigma lenses. Heck, I'm considering a bigma myself. However, one would have to be in a total state of denial not to admit that there are discussions all over the net about sigma QC problems. All you have to do is google it and you'll find posts in almost every photography forum on the net. I'm sure sigma makes good copies, but it's pretty well discussed that they also have an innordinately high amount of bad copies coming off the assembly line.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
Avatar
3,939 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2004
Location: NE England.
     
Sep 21, 2006 15:24 |  #42

05Xrunner wrote in post #2018029 (external link)
AHHHHH just day dreaming about that lens...Just looking through the viewfinder of that thing was amazing. God I need to pull together that 2grand fast

I'll give you a reason to save up then, shall i? ;)

120-300 + 2x TC. 1/320th, F10 on monopod...

http://gsh-motorsports.fotopic.ne​t/p30639276.html (external link)

120-300 (No TC) @ 180mm. 1/800th, F5 Hand-held.

http://gsh-motorsports.fotopic.ne​t/p31393972.html (external link)


As many have said, a lot of the problems with this lens are user error. I've rarely heard a complaint until recently and it's good to see one of the recent posters has now discovered how good this lens is ;)

Any item of equipment can have problems, the fact is that the overwhelming majority of users love this lens and produce excellent work with it.


Geoff www.bhppix.co.uk (external link)
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 21, 2006 15:29 as a reply to  @ GSH's post |  #43

your killing me man..I am trying to figure all over what do i have that I can unload to get the money for this...and you go show me pics like that


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
Avatar
3,939 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2004
Location: NE England.
     
Sep 21, 2006 15:41 |  #44

05Xrunner wrote in post #2018472 (external link)
your killing me man..I am trying to figure all over what do i have that I can unload to get the money for this...and you go show me pics like that

Sorry :D


Geoff www.bhppix.co.uk (external link)
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackviolet
Goldmember
Avatar
1,313 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2004
Location: sydney, au (now in singapore for a few years)
     
Sep 24, 2006 23:25 |  #45

ok i did get my copy on friday afternoon. unfortunately due to the bush fires cancelling games i was scheduled to shoot *and* my wife not feeling well, i did not get a chance to give it a good workout :(

one thing that irritated me to no end: the place where i rented them in the past provided a 105mm lenscap. i guess i was thinking it came with the lens. instead, i get a ballistic nylon sock to put over the end - which doesn't stay on very well and won't stay on if the hood is mounted. it's not even leather like some that i've seen... what the heck is that? in any event, i've order a lenscap from ebay. i called the shop and the one they use is a snap on for a mamiya - so that's what i've ordered.

i have a night game on wednesday, so that'll be the first decent chance to give it a workout.


--
oblio
1dmkiii - 5dmkii -Leica M8/M6 - Mamiya 645AFDiii/zd
ModelMayhem (external link) | my (external link)flick (external link)r gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,485 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
OMG Sigma 120-300 2.8
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2728 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.