Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 22 Sep 2006 (Friday) 07:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Little Dan Sepia Series

 
jaymrobinson
Senior Member
Avatar
718 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Japan, Present Day
     
Sep 22, 2006 07:08 |  #1

Let me know what you think, good or bad. I'm relatively new to photography.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

KissDigital N (350D), EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS, EF 70-200 4L IS, Tamron 18-200 DiII, EF 50 1.8, EF 85 1.8, Tamron 90 Di Macro, 580EX, 430EX, ST-E2
My Pbase:
http://www.pbase.com/j​aymrobinson (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T.Hogan
Senior Member
Avatar
309 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: North Alabama
     
Sep 22, 2006 07:16 |  #2

All great images, love #1 and #5




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
incendy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County
     
Sep 22, 2006 09:55 |  #3

first and last for me too! THey are all great with wonderful tones, great work


Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/incendy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WilliamL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,200 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast
     
Sep 22, 2006 10:40 |  #4

you did a great job... #1 is just great.. they all are...


7D * 40D/w 24-70 L * 20D*17-85 mm*Canon 100-400L IS *Canon 70-300mm*580EX
Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new. Albert Einstein

http://william1956.smu​gmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
locky
Goldmember
Avatar
2,663 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Montague, Michigan
     
Sep 22, 2006 13:45 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Nice work


I just got my first pair of glasses that I didn't think I needed. I apologize to anybody in the past year that I said their pictures were out of focus lol.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
led ­ hed
Goldmember
Avatar
1,929 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Apsley, On. CAN.
     
Sep 22, 2006 13:54 |  #6

love #1.


Rob - "a photographer is a painter, in a hurry!"
Canon 7D ~ Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS MKII ~ Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS ~ Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II ~ Canon 430EX ~ Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender ~ Canon SX230 HS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaymrobinson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
718 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Japan, Present Day
     
Sep 22, 2006 18:16 |  #7

Thanks for the comments. Anything you would have done differently?


KissDigital N (350D), EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS, EF 70-200 4L IS, Tamron 18-200 DiII, EF 50 1.8, EF 85 1.8, Tamron 90 Di Macro, 580EX, 430EX, ST-E2
My Pbase:
http://www.pbase.com/j​aymrobinson (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daBOODA
Member
Avatar
40 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Manly West, Brisbane
     
Sep 22, 2006 23:01 |  #8

On yes! 1st, 4th and 5th ftw!

The first just looks perfectly planned and executed like a photo for an advertisment.

The second doesn't quite do it for me. I think it's because the little boy's expression is less happy than the expressions he makes in the other photos.

The thirs seems a little too sad for this child as he seems to be waiting for someone or something. It's not a bad photo, it just seems to make the child more drawn away from the viewer.

The 4th is just cute as! I'm a big fan of minimal-clutter in photos and this one follows that. Just the boy and the swing, nothing else like trees, fences, cars, other people etc. His expression is just great. It really brings out the personality that happy children this age have.

The 5th is great but I'd suggest cropping it to only include the child and one or both of the swings. Obviously there's still going to be the white wall in the background even if you do crop it so cropping might not solve the clutter of the background. To me, you're either showing the child being in the surroundings or your focusing on the child's emotive expression. In this photo the child has a bewildered look on his face. I personally would have tried to get as much of that into the photo as possible, leaving the surroundings for another photo when the child looks like he's just sitting there looking at the sky etc (or something)

Keep it up :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reefbone
Senior Member
Avatar
929 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Midwest, USA
     
Sep 22, 2006 23:29 as a reply to  @ daBOODA's post |  #9

#1 seems a little flat. I think it benifits from some added contrast... but my edit adds to the posturization already present. I really like #4...too bad the right chain is cut off. Cute little fellow by the way

IMAGE: http://static.flickr.com/80/250213182_9917edcad0_o.jpg

Rebel XT, EF-S 17-55IS f/2.8, EF-S 17-85IS f/4-5.6, EF 50 f/1.4, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX, Manfrotto Anchor, I9900

"I may disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for my right to fight you to the death" - Stephen Colbert

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Sep 22, 2006 23:51 |  #10

Wonderful shots!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaymrobinson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
718 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Japan, Present Day
     
Sep 23, 2006 01:53 |  #11

Thanks for the criticism. It really helps.
daBooda: The first photo was pretty much an accident. I was holding my camera with the nifty-fifty and he reached out his had to mine and I took the shot. :)
I see what you mean about the sadness. However, these pictures where not particularly intended to go together. I just decided to make some sepia images. Put together, I admit, it is a little strange.

Reefbone: I originally tried different contrast settings myself, and decided to go with the softer look, but maybe it is a little too flat. Nice to hear what others think.


KissDigital N (350D), EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS, EF 70-200 4L IS, Tamron 18-200 DiII, EF 50 1.8, EF 85 1.8, Tamron 90 Di Macro, 580EX, 430EX, ST-E2
My Pbase:
http://www.pbase.com/j​aymrobinson (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
30DChris
Member
Avatar
151 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Ft. Lauderedale
     
Sep 23, 2006 09:26 |  #12

awesome shots!


40D and G9 with some L glass and sigma's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
freefallu
Senior Member
Avatar
592 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: madrid
     
Sep 23, 2006 09:30 |  #13

great shots :) and nicely edited .


Cheers David Cowman
Canon 5d, 400D , 24-105 L IS :: 70-200 f4 L :: 50 mm f1.4 :: Sigma 15mm f2.8 :: Canon 35 f1.4L :: Canon 85f1.2L 580EX x 2 ,ST - E2 , 2x Quantum turbo 2x2 batteries, Various flash devices from lumiquest and Stofen. Studio: 2 x Bowens 500 with lots of stuff to complement.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,951 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Little Dan Sepia Series
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2729 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.