Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 22 Sep 2006 (Friday) 20:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New and Old

 
photojag
Senior Member
Avatar
793 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
     
Sep 22, 2006 20:37 |  #1

I took this first pic with my old camera and then returned and took the second with my XT.. let me know what you think. I used different pp on both for the record
1.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/pictures279.jpg
2.
IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v429/vtecjag/gothicpond.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Sep 22, 2006 22:45 |  #2

Personally, I like the first treatment better.

The color palate (more greens than browns and golds) seems to have more in common with a pond. The only thing I would do is straighten it. Verticals should be, well, vertical. About 2° or 3° clockwise should do it. Overall, I like it.

The second shot, I think is hindered by the soft focus processing. It seems that it is just trying too hard to be dreamy. Now I know that that is a matter of personal preference, so take it as such.

On a more objective note, the second shot does win the ¿WTF? award for the most perplexing use of a blotch of purple. :lol:

Rad

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wildewinds
Senior Member
397 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Sep 23, 2006 01:37 |  #3

yeah, the soft focus of the second one doesn't do anything for me either. I like the richer colors of the first shot.


- 20D - Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 - Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
triumph
Member
202 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Sep 23, 2006 03:48 |  #4

I prefer the first image, it draws you in. The second image appears "ordinary" despite the pp.


Canon 5D + BG-E4 grip + POTN Strap
17-40L, 24-105LIS, 28-135IS, 100-400LIS, 50mm/f1.4 100mm macro, 1.4x converter, 2x550EX flash, Gitzo Tripod G1327 + 1376 Head.
Lowepro Dryzone + billingham 445 bags, flashtrax XT, TC-80N3
Selling;
Manfrotto 441 carbonfibre tripod + manfrotto 488 Head
50mm f1.8 mk1, sigma EX 2x convertor, remote switch RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cathpah
Goldmember
Avatar
4,259 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Maine.
     
Sep 23, 2006 09:22 |  #5

if you could darken the sky a bit in the 2nd i bet that'd help that shot a lot.

I think that's why I like the darker first shot than the second...but i'd love to see the sky a bit darker as that might change all that.


Architecture (external link) | Fashion + Beauty (external link) | Travel (external link) | Mayhem (external link) | Instagram (external link)
tools of the trade
My name is Jeff, and I'm addicted to shadows in fashion and brights in architecture. "Hiiiiii Jeff."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris71
Goldmember
Avatar
1,585 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Houston, TX
     
Sep 24, 2006 00:59 as a reply to  @ Cathpah's post |  #6

I have to go against the grain here, and say that I light the tighter crop of the second one.


Chris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Reynolds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,412 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
     
Sep 24, 2006 13:36 |  #7

keep your old camera


a special thanks to the Big Guy upstairs

http://mikereynoldsmot​orsports.com/ (external link)

my gear
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2211782&pos​tcount=289

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Terrywoodenpic
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Saddleworth England
     
Sep 24, 2006 13:57 |  #8

I prefer the first shot (FUJI s3100)
The focus needs to be on the Building on the second one, The depth of field at F3.5 at 1250s is all wrong.. needed f11 at least...
If things get in the way like that flower you should bend them out of the way or move yourself a little. It would have been clearly visible in the finder.
This sort of shot looks best well saturated, so don't be tempted to lighten it up too much.
still you can always try again ..it has potential.


Terry_______________
Over 60 years in photography
wasted money cameras never on film.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,220 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
New and Old
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
559 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.