Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Sep 2006 (Monday) 15:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17-40L or Flash?

 
John_B
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,358 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 2731
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Hawaii
     
Sep 25, 2006 15:58 |  #16

3kids1036,
I would say the 17-40L first (but both if possible). I have taken a number of very low light shots with it without flash. Here is a 49 second exposure with the 17-40L

The Band

IMAGE: http://johnbdigital.com/special_beauty/the_band.jpg
Click for Specs (external link)

Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............  (external link)
click to see (external link)
JohnBdigital.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:02 |  #17

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

This was 1/40 f/4 at 17mm. Go with the lens.

--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
3kids1036
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
94 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:09 |  #18

I think I am going to go with the lens....I am WAY beyond excited!


Canon 20D
Canon 50mm
Tameron 28-200 mm
Canon 17-40L
Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
3kids1036
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
94 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:09 |  #19

tsaraleksi wrote in post #2036314 (external link)
The 17-40 is fine indoors, as long as you aren't some kind of crack fiend you should be able to hand-hold down to 1/40 or so with the wide end of the lens. This gives you a fair bit of freedom indoors. I have a flash and a 17-40 and use the lens more. But I guess it all depends on your purposes. Note, though, that the pop flash will not work with the 17-40 attached.

ROFLOL!!! I am sure I can hand hold perfectly fine! LOL:lol:


Canon 20D
Canon 50mm
Tameron 28-200 mm
Canon 17-40L
Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:10 |  #20

3kids1036 wrote in post #2036468 (external link)
I think I am going to go with the lens....I am WAY beyond excited!

As well you should be. If you're not familar with wide angle, it will be a wonder to behold, and if you've switched from a film system, it will be a relief to have the view back. I continue to love using my 17-40 (ps pick up a film EOS body and then revel in a true 17mm FOV... it's amazing)


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:11 |  #21

I'd say the 17-40 as well.


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
michaelbehlen
Senior Member
352 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Fresno, Ca
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:11 |  #22

Get the 17-40 for now. THe 50mm will hold you over for right now in the dim light situations. For a flash, can I recomend the Promaster 7500DX. It was 50 bucks cheaper than the 430EX Speedlite, and my local shop swears by it.


Michael Behlen
5dmkii | 35mmL | 85mm f/1.8 | Strobes and Such
http://www.astallascli​ffs.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,776 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Sussex UK
     
Sep 25, 2006 16:12 as a reply to  @ 3kids1036's post |  #23

I have a 17-40L and a flash - an oldie but goodie - and use the lens a LOT more than the flash. But I do use the flash a lot too.
i use the lens as my walk-about, and one thing about the 17-40 is that it shades the built-in flash. so you will need a speedlite, but as various other posters have said, it can wait.


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fritz1
Senior Member
558 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 9
Joined May 2006
Location: Delaware Valley
     
Sep 25, 2006 21:21 |  #24

John_B wrote in post #2036411 (external link)
3kids1036,
I would say the 17-40L first (but both if possible). I have taken a number of very low light shots with it without flash. Here is a 49 second exposure with the 17-40L

The Band
QUOTED IMAGE

Click for Specs (external link)

Man John I clicked on the link, and ended up spending the last two + hours on your site, I notice most of your landscape shots are partial or spot metered, how do you keep a balance between the sky and land without blowing out the sky or under exposing the grounds, awsome stuff man.

Ps edit I also say go 17-40


EOS 5D, EOS 5D MKIII, EOS 20D, EOS Elan, AE1Program, Tamrac Expedition 7 backpack Tamrac Expedition 5 backpack, Low Pro AW fanny
EF 17-40 f/4 L, EF 24-105 f/4 L IS, EF 70-200 f4 L,
EF 400 f5.6 L, Sigma 150-600DG HSM OS f5-6.3,
EF 28-105 USM,EF 100-300 USM,580EXII
B+W,POL+FD Lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dorman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,661 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Sep 25, 2006 21:28 |  #25

Ideally get both, if you have to get one before the other get the 17-40 first. I shot with the 17-40 without flash using only ambient light for a long time. Since most of my subjects are static it's no big deal, I use a tripod. Pop over to my site and you can see some outdoor landscape stuff, all shot with the 17-40. If you go in my abandoned gallery almost all of these shots are with the 17-40 too, in low-light, no flash.

Now that I've got the flash I've been practicing using it outdoors to reduce shadows and better expose subjects, and working on bouncing for natural looking light indoors. Both are essential to me.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YosemiteJunkie
Goldmember
Avatar
1,339 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Carrollton, GA
     
Sep 26, 2006 03:02 |  #26

Or you could get both and just have the 17-40L shipped to me ;)


Happy Shooting, Herb
Canon 5D, 20D w/ BG-E2 Grip, Rebel 35mm, 580EX II Flash, 420EX Flash, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, Canon EF 17-40 f/4.0 L, Canon EF 24-105 IS L, Canon EF 28-135 IS, Canon EF 70-200 f/4.0 L, Sigma 150-500 EX DG, Manfrotto 055XProB Tripod, P.O.T.N. Pro Strap (black)http://HerbDunn.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BryanP
Senior Member
Avatar
679 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Northern California
     
Sep 26, 2006 03:21 |  #27

fritz1 wrote in post #2037637 (external link)
Man John I clicked on the link, and ended up spending the last two + hours on your site, I notice most of your landscape shots are partial or spot metered, how do you keep a balance between the sky and land without blowing out the sky or under exposing the grounds, awsome stuff man.

Ps edit I also say go 17-40

use a graduated nd filter

check the stop difference (using spot or partial if u want) between the sky and the foreground, use the darker half of the ND filter to decrease the stop amount of the sky, and expose for the foreground (therefore, you expose the dark areas properly, but since you reduced the intensity of the sky as well, you're pretty much exposing it back to how it actually looks... resulting in an image with properly exposed sky and foreground)


Canon 1D | Canon 10D | Tamron 17-35/2.8-4 | Tamron 28-75/2.8 | Canon 50/1.8 | Canon 70-200/2.8L
The Daily Californian (external link) Photographer

Equipment- My Complete Gear List
Portfolio - Take a look at my portfolio in SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,523 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6402
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Sep 26, 2006 04:32 as a reply to  @ BryanP's post |  #28

17-40 is fantastic on a crop body.
It's ability to lock focus in low light is amazing.
The big flimsy hood is a dissapointment. As the hood is made for a full frame body, it's not doing much on a 20D. You can use an EW-83DII hood instead.
(I've tested on a 20D and it works great) Much more convenient shape, much more solid , and actually works as a hood should!
There's one other hood that works too, forget which one.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris ­ clements
Goldmember
Avatar
1,644 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2004
Location: this scepter'd isle (bottom right corner)
     
Sep 26, 2006 04:41 |  #29

since you posted on the lens forum and not the flash forum, I think we can guess what answer you want to hear.

* Shall I buy new trainers or new jeans next???




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tareq
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
Avatar
17,984 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 552
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ajman - UAE
     
Sep 26, 2006 05:36 as a reply to  @ chris clements's post |  #30

I can't say more than what they told you
lens first, flash is there waiting next, or borrow one if you really need flash for some works.


Galleries:
http://hamrani.deviant​art.com/gallery/ (external link)
Gear List
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,385 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it.
17-40L or Flash?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2849 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.