3kids1036,
I would say the 17-40L first (but both if possible). I have taken a number of very low light shots with it without flash. Here is a 49 second exposure with the 17-40L
The Band
Sep 25, 2006 15:58 | #16 3kids1036, Sony A6400, A6500, Apeman A80, & a bunch of Lenses.............
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsaraleksi Goldmember 1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Sep 25, 2006 16:02 | #17
This was 1/40 f/4 at 17mm. Go with the lens. --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2006 16:09 | #18 I think I am going to go with the lens....I am WAY beyond excited! Canon 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2006 16:09 | #19 tsaraleksi wrote in post #2036314 The 17-40 is fine indoors, as long as you aren't some kind of crack fiend you should be able to hand-hold down to 1/40 or so with the wide end of the lens. This gives you a fair bit of freedom indoors. I have a flash and a 17-40 and use the lens more. But I guess it all depends on your purposes. Note, though, that the pop flash will not work with the 17-40 attached. ROFLOL!!! I am sure I can hand hold perfectly fine! LOL Canon 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsaraleksi Goldmember 1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Sep 25, 2006 16:10 | #20 3kids1036 wrote in post #2036468 I think I am going to go with the lens....I am WAY beyond excited! As well you should be. If you're not familar with wide angle, it will be a wonder to behold, and if you've switched from a film system, it will be a relief to have the view back. I continue to love using my 17-40 (ps pick up a film EOS body and then revel in a true 17mm FOV... it's amazing) --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SoaringUSAEagle Daddy Of The Crop 10,814 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Cheyenne, WY More info | Sep 25, 2006 16:11 | #21 I'd say the 17-40 as well. 5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
michaelbehlen Senior Member 352 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Fresno, Ca More info | Sep 25, 2006 16:11 | #22 Get the 17-40 for now. THe 50mm will hold you over for right now in the dim light situations. For a flash, can I recomend the Promaster 7500DX. It was 50 bucks cheaper than the 430EX Speedlite, and my local shop swears by it. Michael Behlen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
steved110 Cream of the Crop 5,776 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: East Sussex UK More info | I have a 17-40L and a flash - an oldie but goodie - and use the lens a LOT more than the flash. But I do use the flash a lot too. Canon 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2006 21:21 | #24 John_B wrote in post #2036411 3kids1036, I would say the 17-40L first (but both if possible). I have taken a number of very low light shots with it without flash. Here is a 49 second exposure with the 17-40L The Band ![]() Click for Specs Man John I clicked on the link, and ended up spending the last two + hours on your site, I notice most of your landscape shots are partial or spot metered, how do you keep a balance between the sky and land without blowing out the sky or under exposing the grounds, awsome stuff man. EOS 5D, EOS 5D MKIII, EOS 20D, EOS Elan, AE1Program, Tamrac Expedition 7 backpack Tamrac Expedition 5 backpack, Low Pro AW fanny
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dorman Goldmember 4,661 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: Halifax, NS More info | Sep 25, 2006 21:28 | #25 Ideally get both, if you have to get one before the other get the 17-40 first. I shot with the 17-40 without flash using only ambient light for a long time. Since most of my subjects are static it's no big deal, I use a tripod. Pop over to my site and you can see some outdoor landscape stuff, all shot with the 17-40. If you go in my abandoned gallery almost all of these shots are with the 17-40 too, in low-light, no flash.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YosemiteJunkie Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Carrollton, GA More info | Sep 26, 2006 03:02 | #26 Or you could get both and just have the 17-40L shipped to me Happy Shooting, Herb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BryanP Senior Member 679 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Northern California More info | Sep 26, 2006 03:21 | #27 fritz1 wrote in post #2037637 Man John I clicked on the link, and ended up spending the last two + hours on your site, I notice most of your landscape shots are partial or spot metered, how do you keep a balance between the sky and land without blowing out the sky or under exposing the grounds, awsome stuff man. Ps edit I also say go 17-40 use a graduated nd filter Canon 1D | Canon 10D | Tamron 17-35/2.8-4 | Tamron 28-75/2.8 | Canon 50/1.8 | Canon 70-200/2.8L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Choderboy I like a long knob More info | 17-40 is fantastic on a crop body. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrisclements Goldmember 1,644 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2004 Location: this scepter'd isle (bottom right corner) More info | Sep 26, 2006 04:41 | #29 since you posted on the lens forum and not the flash forum, I think we can guess what answer you want to hear.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | I can't say more than what they told you Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2849 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||