Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 26 Sep 2006 (Tuesday) 19:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Country church

 
mlc
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Sep 26, 2006 19:02 |  #1

I took this shot exposing for the dramatic sky but that left the foreground way too dark - so I had a go breaking into two images, lightening the foreground and recombining. This is the first time I have tried this - does it work - what could be done better? Thanks for any comments or suggestions.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mike
5D Mk3; 7D; 24-105 F4; 70-200 F2.8 Mk2; 300 F2.8 Mk2; 500 F4 Mk2;1.4x and 2x Mk 3 Extenders; 055CXPRO3; Benro GH2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wildewinds
Senior Member
397 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Sep 26, 2006 23:35 |  #2

I think it's a great shot. The only issue I have is that the foreground is exposed so well that it looks fake against the evening sky. I would tone it down a bit to make it look more realistic.


- 20D - Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 - Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 -

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Sep 27, 2006 08:47 |  #3

What you have accomplished, manually, is not much different that the effect gained in Merge to HDR. You have compressed an extreme range of tones into the limited (0 - 255) range of the RGB system.

In my opinion, the result is very dramatic and does not look that un-natural. It is the colors that I might quibble about - they seem just a bit strange, but I still like the overall effect.

Congratulations!


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mlc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Sep 27, 2006 11:04 |  #4

Thank you both for your comments.

Bob, I am using Photoshop Elements. I am guessing "Merge to HDR" is a facility in Photoshop CS2 as I cannot see it in Elements?


Mike
5D Mk3; 7D; 24-105 F4; 70-200 F2.8 Mk2; 300 F2.8 Mk2; 500 F4 Mk2;1.4x and 2x Mk 3 Extenders; 055CXPRO3; Benro GH2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Sep 27, 2006 15:08 |  #5

mlc wrote in post #2044349 (external link)
Thank you both for your comments.

Bob, I am using Photoshop Elements. I am guessing "Merge to HDR" is a facility in Photoshop CS2 as I cannot see it in Elements?

True - However, for purposes of this discussion, it does not really matter. There are purely manual methods of doing essentially the same thing using layers and gradients. Unfortunately, I am not familiar with what is and what is not included in Elements.

The principle of Merge to HDR is to simply combine the characteristics of a pixel in image A with the characteristics of the same pixel in image B, so as to produce a pixel in the result image, C, that is appropriate for the merge objective (to produce a continuous tone image of high quality).


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 27, 2006 20:43 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Please post the image in "normal" mode. I don't like many "hdr" shots and I don't like this. Shadows are a necessary element in photography. The best shots usually have great lighting - that no "hdr" method can replicate.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T.O.
POTN People/Portrait Photographer 2006
Avatar
376 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Sep 29, 2006 03:01 |  #7

The result that you wanted to achieve is there, I would like to see some more contrast in the foreground, church and trees, it would mach better your sky.
regards,
T.O.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mlc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Sep 29, 2006 17:31 |  #8

I know what you mean, Hellashot, I am a bit ambivalent about the hdr effect but in this case getting the colour coming through in the sky left practically a sillouhette of the trees and church.

I will have a further play with the foreground contrast, TO, and see how it goes.

Your comments are much appreciated.


Mike
5D Mk3; 7D; 24-105 F4; 70-200 F2.8 Mk2; 300 F2.8 Mk2; 500 F4 Mk2;1.4x and 2x Mk 3 Extenders; 055CXPRO3; Benro GH2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ E
Goldmember
Avatar
1,100 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
     
Oct 02, 2006 11:44 |  #9
bannedPermanently

I really like your shot. The coloring in the sky mixed with no shadows with the cemetary and church really make it look like something supernatural is about to happen. Nice job! Also, could you add the 2 shots you merged? I'd like to see those as well!


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 03, 2006 14:02 |  #10

I like the shot too. The sky color doesn't bother me a bit since I've seen many like that. The lack of shadow in the foreground was at first strange but then I looked at it as heavily diffused light, probably from a cloudy day. It does give the image a different feel but it's good IMO. You might add a little light to the trees too.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,351 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Country church
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
926 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.