If this lens has ANY characteristics of of the 85L, then it will be worth it to me.
I know of ONE already... $$$$$ 
TheSteveMadden Goldmember 1,229 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Florida More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:08 | #16 Dante King wrote in post #2045500 If this lens has ANY characteristics of of the 85L, then it will be worth it to me. I know of ONE already... $$$$$ Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:10 | #17 |
Luckie8 Senior Member 995 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Wake County, NC More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:12 | #18 steved110 wrote in post #2045452 At the moment, my heart is set on a 30mm from sigma. I agree Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is a sweeeet lens...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:15 | #19 jiggling_john wrote in post #2045448 But... WHY....! It surely cannot be so significantly better than the 1.4 (apart from weather sealing which is a fair comment). Image wise, it will surely be very, very close between the 1.4 and 1.2? I think it will be very noticeably sharper at f/1.4 than the 1.4 itself. The focus will be more accurate, and the build a hundred times better. The nifty fifty feels like garbage..but so does the 1.4, compared to an L. This one will be metal vs. plastic, tank build vs. cheapy, contrasty vs. not, etc. I can go on.. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:16 | #20 Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2045539 I think it will be very noticeably sharper at f/1.4 than the 1.4 itself. .. I dont know Ronnie, my 1.4 was almost too sharp! Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:17 | #21 When stopped down, yes. I mean wide open. I've never had a 50 1.4 (I've had a few!) that was anywhere near "too sharp" at f/1.4. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:18 | #22 Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2045550 When stopped down, yes. I mean wide open. that is what I mean too. my 50 1,4 was super sharp, even at 1.4. almost too sharp. Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied 12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:20 | #23 I'd like faster, greater focus accuracy and wide open performance than on my 50mm 1.4. Given how much I use my 1.4 I could justify buying the 1.2, it'd pay for itself for what I do. It's on my long-term list, though, there are many more lenses I'd benefit from more first and I'll only be upgrading after I get all of those. Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheSteveMadden Goldmember 1,229 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Florida More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:21 | #24 Dante King wrote in post #2045560 that is what I mean too. my 50 1,4 was super sharp, even at 1.4. almost too sharp. "Was", or "is"? Did you get rid of it? Steve
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:27 | #25 TheSteveMadden wrote in post #2045575 "Was", or "is"? Did you get rid of it? just sold it to make room for the 1.2 BABY!! Heck I just let my 1dsmk2 go too! Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:35 | #26 Poop. I was gonna ask what you wanted for your 1.4. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister 9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:36 | #27 dont flip Ronnie, but I sold it for 2bills. Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | How much is it again? Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:45 | #29 $1599, Tareq. Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Sep 27, 2006 16:54 | #30 Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2045654 $1599, Tareq. Dante, damn you. You should have asked me first. I'd have even given you more.ok,maybe i can sell my 2 copies if you want Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2905 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||