I vote for Canon 10-22
2 shots, fireworks by 350D, sea shot by 30D
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer"  More info | I vote for Canon 10-22 Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichardtheSane Goldmember  3,011 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Nottingham UK More info | Sep 27, 2006 17:54 | #17 I've had the 17-40L. Wasn't wide enough If in doubt, I shut up...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BradT0517 I almost caught fire  3,010 posts Joined Aug 2006 More info | Sep 27, 2006 17:59 | #18 I would say get the 10-22 but if you plan on a full frame camera anytime soon go with the 17-40
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Sep 27, 2006 18:12 | #19 englishw wrote in post #2045887  Canon also makes the 16-35 f/2.8L....I drool over that one everytime I bump my ISO up past 400 on my 17-40 f/4L... 16-35 f2.8L is something else      Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Sep 27, 2006 18:30 | #21 BradT0517 wrote in post #2046024 I like number 3 but the crookedness really bugs me Lens is Fast Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | or if you want i can send the original file so then you fix it. Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cgratti Lord_Malone, your still a newb...  3,315 posts Joined Feb 2004 Location: E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES More info | Sep 27, 2006 18:34 | #23 Any of these are fine lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AeroSmith Goldmember  More info | How about one of these: Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know?  More info | Sep 27, 2006 19:59 | #25 |
Tareq "I am very lazy, a normal consumer" More info | Sep 27, 2006 20:06 | #26 runninmann wrote in post #2046346 Nice shots, Tareq. I especially like the desert palmscape. Thank you very much Galleries:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know? More info | Sep 27, 2006 20:14 | #27 |
braduardo Goldmember  2,630 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Minneapolis, MN More info | Sep 27, 2006 20:20 | #28 It looks like the OP currently has 28mm on the wide end, so the EF-S 10-22mm would fit in really nicely. I used one for a weekend, and loved it. It's so wide that if you tip the camer down just a little bit, you will get your toes in the shot.  Wide enough for you?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop  20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Sep 27, 2006 20:22 | #29 I'll never get rid of my 16-35 f/2.8L. It's one heck of a great lens on my 20D and will be on the (someday) 1-series body. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 27, 2006 20:29 | #30 Well, the Canon 10-22 it is... Now I'll sell my Canon 75-300mm and the Canon 50mm f/1.8 MKII to get some money and make some room in my camera bag...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is monmon 897 guests, 189 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Oops, I mistook the first pic for desert palms.
----Brad---- 
