lol yes the 5.6 wow is quite a turn on lol :O
you should try it at F/8, so sharp it burns the LCD 
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 29, 2006 05:20 | #16 baybud wrote in post #2052593 lol yes the 5.6 wow is quite a turn on lol :O you should try it at F/8, so sharp it burns the LCD "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baybud Senior Member 419 posts Joined Feb 2006 More info | i tend not to use it too much beyond f/4, well for most of my wildlife i normally use it at f/2.8, but i used it in corfu for some landscape at f/8, although that was a rarity.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 29, 2006 05:29 | #18 baybud wrote in post #2052618 i tend not to use it too much beyond f/4, well for most of my wildlife i normally use it at f/2.8, but i used it in corfu for some landscape at f/8, although that was a rarity. The only time mine sees F/4 or F/5.6 is with the extenders on "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baybud Senior Member 419 posts Joined Feb 2006 More info | do you use it with the 2x? if so is it any good? I was thinking about getting a 2x at some point, but i've not been terribly impressed by it so far lol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 29, 2006 05:35 | #20 baybud wrote in post #2052632 do you use it with the 2x? if so is it any good? I was thinking about getting a 2x at some point, but i've not been terribly impressed by it so far lol Yes I have, here is a sample pic at F/5.6 "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrfourcows Goldmember 2,108 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2006 Location: london More info |
baybud Senior Member 419 posts Joined Feb 2006 More info | oo. thankyou
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 29, 2006 05:38 | #23 Jaetie wrote in post #2052645 looks good! thank you, the 300 takes the 2x extender probably the best of any Canon lens "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 29, 2006 05:39 | #24 The 200 1.8 is generally accepted as one of the sharpest, if not THE sharpest, lenses ever produced. Usually followed by the 135 F2 and 300 F2.8. Michael Springfield - Chattanooga, TN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 29, 2006 05:39 | #25 baybud wrote in post #2052648 oo. thankyou Well it's convinced me lol, it's the easiest and cheapest route to get to 600 in my position so i think when i have the funds i'll get one.600 f/5.6 ain't bad "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
baybud Senior Member 419 posts Joined Feb 2006 More info | Sep 29, 2006 06:56 | #26 i suppose it will have to do
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 29, 2006 07:14 | #27 Permanent banblackviolet wrote in post #2052588 avoid the red stripe, low budget sigmas (which are generally sold by wolf/ritz as part of the quantaray - run away and don't look back) the 85mm 1.8 is very sharp and i'll also give a strong agreement for the 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
muscleflex Goldmember 3,013 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2005 Location: UK More info | Sep 29, 2006 08:55 | #28 AGENT 99 wrote in post #2052494 lol, so basically anytihng with a red line going around the end of it? ![]() sigma cheap lenses have red lines going round the end of them too!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop 7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info |
peterdoomen Goldmember 1,123 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Lier, Flanders (northern, flemish speaking part of Belgium) More info | Sep 29, 2006 10:58 | #30 The sharpest lens is the 200 f/1.8. It beats other lenses at all apertures. But that one is very expensive and hard to find. Second will be the 500 f/4, closey followed by 85 f/1.2 and 135 f/2. See my footer (glass buying guide) for some graphics comparing different lenses. Canon EOS 20D | Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS + Hoya UV Filter | Canon Extender 1.4x | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Canon 85 f/1.2L mk II | Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-f/4| Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Tokina 100 f/2.8 macro | Kenko extension tubes | Canon Speedlite 420 EX & Sto-fen Omnibounce| 80GB Flashtrax | Manfrotto Tripod 190 pro B & Joystick 322RC2 | Lowepro Micro Trekker 200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 855 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||