And just to show u how slow you can shoot handheld with this lens heres one at 200mm f/4 and 1/60 shutter w/flash lol
bluej511 Senior Member 765 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: 508-MA....Nice,France More info | Oct 02, 2006 18:04 | #46 And just to show u how slow you can shoot handheld with this lens heres one at 200mm f/4 and 1/60 shutter w/flash lol My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
braduardo Goldmember  2,630 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Minneapolis, MN More info | Oct 02, 2006 18:07 | #47 Depending on what I am shooting, I find that I am quite often below the 1/focal lenght "rule". I'm pretty steady handheld most of the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember  4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Oct 02, 2006 18:42 | #48 MegaHurtz wrote in post #2064218  No, the smell is the one that escapes from your wallet, after becoming completely devoid of all money. No wonder why my wallet stinks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cali Senior Member  266 posts Joined Jan 2006 More info | For the price you will not get a better L lens than this. 20D, 17-85 kit lens, 70-200 F4, 50 1.4, Amvona AT CF 994 Tripod, Manrotto Monopod that I have never used and a 580EX Flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bluej511 Senior Member 765 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: 508-MA....Nice,France More info | Oct 03, 2006 19:09 | #50 Here you go guys my new lowest handheld shutter speed at the longer end  My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember 4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Oct 03, 2006 22:44 | #51 bluej511 wrote in post #2073221 Here you go guys my new lowest handheld shutter speed at the longer end 2 -1 Exposure 200mm f/4 1/40  no sharpening.A higher ISO (maybe 400 or 800) or using a monopod or tripod to be able to close down to f5.6 or f/8 at 1/80 or faster would be nice to look at as well?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bluej511 Senior Member 765 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: 508-MA....Nice,France More info | Oct 04, 2006 06:24 | #52 i could probably do f/5.6 handheld My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TBAATAR Member 167 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: London More info | Oct 04, 2006 06:43 | #53 so nice! I'm still waiting for my 17-40L and I want the 70-200L too :< . I'm hoping someone will buy me for X-mas!! Canon 30D | EF-S 18-55 | 70-200L F/4 | FlickR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jr_senator Goldmember 4,861 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Oct 04, 2006 09:08 | #54 bluej511 wrote in post #2074995 i could probably do f/5.6 handheld I'm sure you could do ISO 50, f/16 and 1/2 sec if you wished. The point being would a smaller aperture stablized by a faster shutter speed using a higher ISO or some support do a better job?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fi20100 Slightly late  3,587 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Finland More info | Oct 04, 2006 09:20 | #55 What is that emotion I'm feeling... EVNY! Stefan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim"  5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Oct 04, 2006 09:29 | #56 This isn't a thread I'm meant to be reading - just got my first L, I'm really note meant to be reading about number 2! Congratulations though - it's a superb lens. D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bluej511 Senior Member 765 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: 508-MA....Nice,France More info | Oct 04, 2006 10:39 | #57 senator i dont have ISO50 and no IS either its just the f/4 Version. Just trying to show that IS isnt needed if you know what your doing My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Oct 04, 2006 11:03 | #58 bluej511 wrote in post #2075720 senator i dont have ISO50 and no IS either its just the f/4 Version. Just trying to show that IS isnt needed if you know what your doing So I saw (I read your message properly D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bluej511 Senior Member 765 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: 508-MA....Nice,France More info | Oct 04, 2006 11:16 | #59 Well the actual size did seem a tiny bit blurry but print size or online size or if i needed it for work then it would be fine. My Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goatee "nice but dim" 5,239 posts Joined May 2005 Location: North of London, UK More info | Oct 05, 2006 01:57 | #60 Hehe, I'm not a (gun) shooter, but I've been told that the technique is effectively to that used by a marksman D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2607 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
----Brad---- 
green with envy!