Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Sep 2006 (Friday) 23:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

50mm 1.8 II Hood

 
Fureinku
Goldmember
Avatar
1,339 posts
Likes: 27
Joined May 2006
Location: DFW, TX
     
Sep 29, 2006 23:44 |  #1

ok, seeing as how the front element seems to be recessed, would a hood be necessary with this lens? should i just dump the 20 bucks for the adapter and hood from amazon?


Gear List | Wish List |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Sep 29, 2006 23:52 |  #2

Fureinku wrote in post #2055910 (external link)
ok, seeing as how the front element seems to be recessed, would a hood be necessary with this lens? should i just dump the 20 bucks for the adapter and hood from amazon?

I bought the hood. I'm pretty much a hood freak because I don't like filters (except for CPL and ND). The hood buys me protection of the front element. Oh, and it blocks out sunlight sometimes. :-)


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
Avatar
5,705 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Chicago / San Francisco
     
Sep 30, 2006 01:00 |  #3

you can also get one of those 52mm screw-on lens hoods from any camera store. Looks a little weird, but it does the job. It's actually rubber, so it absorbs inpact even better :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,776 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Sussex UK
     
Sep 30, 2006 02:24 as a reply to  @ cmM's post |  #4

A hood is not necessary on this lens, but if you have to have one get a generic rubber hood with a 52mm thread, as cmM advised.

The lens is so flimsy that bashing it is a bad idea period. I cannnot imagine how a hood will save the day with any serious impact. I like filters to aid in keeping the front element of a lens clean. But I don't expect them to protect in any other way.


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fureinku
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,339 posts
Likes: 27
Joined May 2006
Location: DFW, TX
     
Sep 30, 2006 03:07 |  #5

I dont use hoods for protection, i buy them to reduce flaring, but the front element is already recessed, is flaring an issue ever?


Gear List | Wish List |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aero145
Senior Member
Avatar
909 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Germany
     
Sep 30, 2006 18:09 |  #6

Fureinku wrote in post #2056342 (external link)
I dont use hoods for protection, i buy them to reduce flaring, but the front element is already recessed, is flaring an issue ever?

I was photographing last friday, at night. Testing: 17-85 IS, 17-40 L, and 70-200 L (f/4). All had a lot of flare... But all had hoods. 17-85 and 17-40 had filters... but 70-200 didn't, but it did flare a lot... Very suspicious. At least, I think a hood would be a good buy. I have it, and it makes the lens so nice a funny. :-P


EOS 5D Mark II | EF24-105 f/4L IS | EF100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | EF200 f/2.8L II | 580EX | Manfrotto 055xProB + 808RC4, and 679B
Le Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cjm
Goldmember
Avatar
4,786 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Sep 30, 2006 18:17 |  #7

I got a hood with mine when I bought it from Hauff. Not sure if it actually does anything or not but it certainly makes it look less whimpy. So if it works or not, I use it anyways. Also bought me a cheap Canon UV filter for this lens because the lens is so hard to clean that it make sense.

The hood is the old fashioned typed hoods from Canon, not a fit but rather it latches on like a docked starship.


Christopher J. Martin
imagesbychristopher.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,192 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
50mm 1.8 II Hood
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2912 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.