gef Senior Member  322 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Nova Scotia, Canada More info | Oct 02, 2006 11:04 | #16 I believe the quality control issues were related to Sigma's 18-50 2.8 not their 17-70 2.8-4.5. If it was the constant f/2.8 I was after, I would have went with the Tamron, but I wanted the range more with the semi-marco. I do plan to build up my collection of primes for low light settings. Greg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MeNiS Senior Member 706 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2005 More info | Oct 02, 2006 14:03 | #17 i went with the sigma 17-70. i've read alot of good things about it. it offers more range and the quality/price is very good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Broncobear Goldmember  2,415 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada More info | Oct 02, 2006 18:05 | #18 I got the sigma it really was good, only thing to be sure of is test out on there before bringing it home. "The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." "
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2915 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
