Hi, all... I've been lurking on the site for a few weeks now. What a great place this is.
Anyway, hopefully this isn't exactly a "which lens should I buy question". I am currently shooting with a 300D, with a Canon 75-300 mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM. I am trying to get good photos of my son playing football. Thus far, I have been unsuccessful. Most of the shots are blurry. I am just starting to learn to use the creative modes of the camera. I realize that a lot of my problem lies within myself and the camera.
Nevertheless, I think a lense upgrade would help as well, as my lens appears to be pretty much the bottom of the line. I am interested in 2 lenses, the Canon 70-300 mm EF f/4-5.6 IS USM and theCanon 70-200 mm EF F4 L USM. Mostly, I am interested in these two lenses because they are at the limit of what I want to spend for a lens.
So I guess my main question is, which of these two lenses will better suit the needs of a "developing" photography hobbiest, and I use "developing" loosely, as I have a long way to go. Which is more important, having an L series lens, or having Image Stablizing?
Or, am I being completely unrealistic about getting good action photos with my 300D and a lens in the $600-800 price range?
Thanks in advance for any advice and thanks for a great place to learn.

