So is the 16-35 the equivilant of the 10-22

So the title says it all is the 16-35 the FF 10-22 equivilant

that is correct! 10-22 on a crop body is equal to 16-35 on a full frame

However the 2 lenses are NOT equivalent - the 16-35 is a constant f/2.8 aperture L build/ quality lens. the 10-22 is an EF-S lens with some very good glass inside of it, however is a much slower lens, and is not built like an L

This doesn't matter over much as it is mainly a landscape lens, and unless you are into avalanche shots or the odd piroplastic flow they don't move that fast!

steved110 wrote in post #2067158
However the 2 lenses are NOT equivalent - the 16-35 is a constant f/2.8 aperture L build/ quality lens. the 10-22 is an EF-S lens with some very good glass inside of it, however is a much slower lens, and is not built like an L

This doesn't matter over much as it is mainly a landscape lens, and unless you are into avalanche shots or the odd piroplastic flow they don't move that fast!

Yea I always go get a Cannon take it to the mountains so i can use my Canon and take pictures.