Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Oct 2006 (Tuesday) 15:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 f.4 USM v new 70-200 f.4 IS USM Lens

 
Sue ­ H
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Oct 03, 2006 15:36 |  #1

Have decided to go for the 70-200mm f.4 lens as I havent heard one single word said against it but now the IS version is coming out what do you guys out there think, is the IS version worth the extra money? I see Warehouse Express have it marked up for £990 that is double the price! And do you think the price of the USM only version will go down in price now this newer version has come out? It isnt a heavy lens and should be easy enough to handhold. The new lens will be used for travel and general everyday stuff. I am happy to pay out for IS if you think it is the right way to go :confused:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Oct 03, 2006 15:40 |  #2

i think its a bit expensive at the mo. the non IS is great, i would spend the difference on something else. you could almost get a 300f4IS and 70-200 f4 (secondhand) for that price... oh look... thats what ive got! and it works great:)


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:20 |  #3

Don't know, do you need/want IS, and if so for how much more?


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BassBiggieD
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Arizona
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:22 |  #4

id get a sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX APO DG(second hand) for a little more than the 70-200mm f4


|Gear|Zenfolio (external link)|https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=553345

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:26 |  #5

Unless weight is an issue, I'd think that the extra stop of the non-IS 2.8 would be preferable to f4 IS. (though not so much if you are shooting stationary subjects mostly)


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:26 as a reply to  @ BassBiggieD's post |  #6

I had the 70-200f4L....it was fantastic.
Razor sharp images wide open and it was just a gem of a lens. It took me a long time to let it go..I just upgraded to the Sigma 70-200 2.8 DG and will be here tomorrow I cant wait to use the new lens


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BassBiggieD
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Arizona
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:28 |  #7

05Xrunner wrote in post #2073982 (external link)
I had the 70-200f4L....it was fantastic.
Razor sharp images wide open and it was just a gem of a lens. It took me a long time to let it go..I just upgraded to the Sigma 70-200 2.8 DG and will be here tomorrow I cant wait to use the new lens

oh the antisipation!!! you will love the lens:D;)


|Gear|Zenfolio (external link)|https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=553345

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,764 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:29 as a reply to  @ BassBiggieD's post |  #8

yes I know...i got it 2nd hand and it was MINT and he sent me pics of it wide open and looked good. I got it for $670 shipped


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BassBiggieD
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Arizona
     
Oct 03, 2006 22:31 |  #9

05Xrunner wrote in post #2073996 (external link)
yes I know...i got it 2nd hand and it was MINT and he sent me pics of it wide open and looked good. I got it for $670 shipped

same price i got mine for!!! mine was mint too and way sharp wide open!!

the extra stops are definatly worth the price! go for the sigma if you can pay for the canon f2.8


|Gear|Zenfolio (external link)|https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=553345

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kram
obvious its pointless
2,612 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2005
     
Oct 03, 2006 23:57 |  #10

I wouldnt pay that much extra for IS on the 70-200. It rocks even without IS :)


Canon 7D , Canon 6D, 100-400 L, 24-105 F4 L, 50 F1.4, Tokina 12-24 F4, Kenko Teleplus Pro DG 1.4X Extender
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,217 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
70-200 f.4 USM v new 70-200 f.4 IS USM Lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1374 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.