biggpopa Goldmember 1,179 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Canada More info | Oct 03, 2006 18:55 | #1 Hi all. Just thought I'd share a pick with my new lens. I took it with me to Niagara Falls (will post a pick later). Took this pic of my wife while we were at Niagara on the lake. A beautiful town close to Niagara Falls.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2006 19:02 | #2 Just wondering how you guys get an image to be 100KB, and still retain the quality of the pic? I have the image in RAW, but can't manage to get the pic to be 100mb, and retain the quality? The above pic, was as best as I could get it. It looks much sharper in raw.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper.  More info | do you mean 100kb My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aidenswarrior Senior Member  535 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Gahanna, Ohio More info | Oct 03, 2006 19:14 | #4 I have this lens and i have compared it to the 17-40 and i found the tamron to be an overall better lens, personally. I know the canon has better build quality and focusing, but, the overall image seems to be sharper and more colorful with the 17-50. I have to do very little editing to my pictures. I also take the price difference in to consideration when comparing the lenses. 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2006 19:15 | #5 05Xrunner wrote in post #2073237  do you mean 100kb I use in Photoshop Save for web and setting of Jpeg high...usually my 800x600 are 100k and retain pretty much all its quality Yes...oops
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2006 19:16 | #6 Aidenswarrior wrote in post #2073246 I have this lens and i have compared it to the 17-40 and i found the tamron to be an overall better lens, personally. I know the canon has better build quality and focusing, but, the overall image seems to be sharper and more colorful with the 17-50. I have to do very little editing to my pictures. I also take the price difference in to consideration when comparing the lenses. I agree. I didn't have to do very much in PS. I'm glad I went with this lens. So far I've not been disappointed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Souwalker Goldmember 1,128 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Oct 03, 2006 20:49 | #7 biggpopa wrote in post #2073186 Just wondering how you guys get an image to be 100KB, and still retain the quality of the pic? I have the image in RAW, but can't manage to get the pic to be 100mb, and retain the quality? The above pic, was as best as I could get it. It looks much sharper in raw. This is exactly what I was asking in another thread. I use Paint Shop pro X and I don't see an option like PS. Is there an individual software to recommend?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
braduardo Goldmember  2,630 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Minneapolis, MN More info | Oct 03, 2006 20:53 | #8 Use the Windows XP power tool...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2006 21:55 | #9 braduardo wrote in post #2073602 Use the Windows XP power tool... In the raw preview, right click then pick "save as" then save it as a jpeg (I put them on my desktop so they are easier to find *then keep them cleaned up after uploading*) I right click on the file on my desktop, and select "resize photos" and pick the one to fit a 600x800 screen. Then I upload the reduced image. Should be around 100k or so. good to know. Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Souwalker Goldmember 1,128 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Oct 03, 2006 22:04 | #10 braduardo wrote in post #2073602 Use the Windows XP power tool... In the raw preview, right click then pick "save as" then save it as a jpeg (I put them on my desktop so they are easier to find *then keep them cleaned up after uploading*) I right click on the file on my desktop, and select "resize photos" and pick the one to fit a 600x800 screen. Then I upload the reduced image. Should be around 100k or so. Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dailykimchi Member  52 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Canadian in Seoul, SK More info | Oct 04, 2006 11:56 | #11 Beautiful shot. Any more pics to share? Mind I ask how much you paid for the Tamron lens in Cdn? The Daily Kimchi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2006 21:49 | #12 dailykimchi wrote in post #2076019 Beautiful shot. Any more pics to share? Mind I ask how much you paid for the Tamron lens in Cdn? I'll post a few picks in a bit, but I paid $499 CAD for it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Here are a couple of other pics from Niagara Falls.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2934 guests, 168 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
----Brad---- 