If Bristol camera's are doing it for £900 then it makes it cheaper than the 35mm f/1.4 doesnt it?
That seems reasonable then. way out of my price range but if you think the 35mm f/2.0 is just under £200 and loads of people think the f/1.4 is like gods eyeball and worth the expta then i think the price of the 50mm f/1.2L is in line with the others.
Just MHO of course and no, i would not pay that much for a lens that didnt sing at least one tune and dance at the same time 


