Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 05 Oct 2006 (Thursday) 04:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What prime?

 
Gottdammerung
Member
118 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Oct 05, 2006 04:27 |  #1

Hi,

I've been slowly learning a bit about photography with my EOS 350D over the past six months and I'm going to upgrade to the 400D in a months time. When I do so, I was thinking of trying out a prime lens.

My budget's fairly tight so I was looking more towards the EF 50mm f/1.8 or the EF 28mm F/2. Just wondering what peoples' opinions are of these and what I should go for?


Canon EOS 40D, EOS 5, Kodak DCS 520
w/ EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 24-105mm L f/4 IS USM, EF 70-200mm L f/4 IS USM, EF 50mm F/1.8
MY FLICKR PAGE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Oct 05, 2006 04:31 |  #2

Well, the first question would be, what do you want to shoot? 50mm is very versatile...not so with the 28...yet it is a nice landscape mm size. You'd get a bit of distortion with it if you tried to use it for a portrait (aside from the fact that you'd have to practically be in the person's lap...:lol: ). It really depends on what you hope to do with it.


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,118 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Austin,TX
     
Oct 05, 2006 04:35 |  #3

agree with permagrin, but instead of "sidegrading" why not pick up some better lenses? Better than the 50 1.8.


-Andy-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,255 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Oct 05, 2006 04:38 |  #4

The 50mm 1.8 is a great lens to start off with as far as primes go, it'll really give you an idea of what you want out of a lens without breaking the budget.

I think you may mean 35mm f/2.0 though... or 28mm 2.8 or 28mm 1.8.


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irhxcbcziuzxs
Senior Member
449 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Oct 05, 2006 05:02 |  #5

Gottdammerung wrote in post #2079250 (external link)
Hi,

I've been slowly learning a bit about photography with my EOS 350D over the past six months and I'm going to upgrade to the 400D in a months time. When I do so, I was thinking of trying out a prime lens.

My budget's fairly tight so I was looking more towards the EF 50mm f/1.8 or the EF 28mm F/2. Just wondering what peoples' opinions are of these and what I should go for?

my first questions would be, why are you upgrading to a 400D, there really isnt that much of a difference, if you are on a tight budget, id hold that money for some more equip or hold it for a 30d-5d...

i dont know alot, but it really depends on what you shoot..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gottdammerung
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
118 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Oct 05, 2006 05:03 |  #6

Yeah, I meant the 28mm f/2.8 - early morning typo.. lol..

No, I tend to do more in the way of urban photography this now, graffiti and shots round the city. I'm also beginning to look more into night shots as well as I've found some cool places round London with unusual illumination, though I still feel a complete beginner regarding night stuff this now as I still have to get a grip with balancing the exposures with different light sources.. (either that or I'll have to start cheating a bit more with photshop and making composite images from bracketed shots.. :P )


Canon EOS 40D, EOS 5, Kodak DCS 520
w/ EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 24-105mm L f/4 IS USM, EF 70-200mm L f/4 IS USM, EF 50mm F/1.8
MY FLICKR PAGE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gottdammerung
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
118 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Oct 05, 2006 05:07 |  #7

irhxcbcziuzxs wrote in post #2079335 (external link)
my first questions would be, why are you upgrading to a 400D, there really isnt that much of a difference, if you are on a tight budget, id hold that money for some more equip or hold it for a 30d-5d...

i dont know alot, but it really depends on what you shoot..

Probably because I'm wanting to start saving after the new year for my planned travels in a year's time (which on my salary means very little spare cash..) and want to get something that won't lose it's value just as much in that time ( I'm banking on Canon taking at least 2+ years to come up with a replacement for the 400D).

The deal I have with my friend that's buying the camera means I can get the 400D and have about £100 spare, so that's what I have for a prime to try out. The 1.6x conversion factor isn't too much of an issue as I have a EOS 300 kicking around my box should I want to try it on a 35mm frame.


Canon EOS 40D, EOS 5, Kodak DCS 520
w/ EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 24-105mm L f/4 IS USM, EF 70-200mm L f/4 IS USM, EF 50mm F/1.8
MY FLICKR PAGE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irhxcbcziuzxs
Senior Member
449 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Michigan
     
Oct 05, 2006 05:56 |  #8

Gottdammerung wrote in post #2079346 (external link)
Probably because I'm wanting to start saving after the new year for my planned travels in a year's time (which on my salary means very little spare cash..) and want to get something that won't lose it's value just as much in that time ( I'm banking on Canon taking at least 2+ years to come up with a replacement for the 400D).

The deal I have with my friend that's buying the camera means I can get the 400D and have about £100 spare, so that's what I have for a prime to try out. The 1.6x conversion factor isn't too much of an issue as I have a EOS 300 kicking around my box should I want to try it on a 35mm frame.

ok gotcha, though id prefer the 350d over the 400 , but you know, maybe im wierd. Enjoy the 400d when you get it , i still have to get my first dslr




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Col_M
Goldmember
Avatar
1,110 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Prague, Czech Rep.
     
Oct 05, 2006 06:22 |  #9

Gottdammerung wrote in post #2079346 (external link)
Probably because I'm wanting to start saving after the new year for my planned travels in a year's time (which on my salary means very little spare cash..) and want to get something that won't lose it's value just as much in that time ( I'm banking on Canon taking at least 2+ years to come up with a replacement for the 400D).

The deal I have with my friend that's buying the camera means I can get the 400D and have about £100 spare, so that's what I have for a prime to try out. The 1.6x conversion factor isn't too much of an issue as I have a EOS 300 kicking around my box should I want to try it on a 35mm frame.

I can see where you're coming from with the 350D being worth less than the 400D in a couple years but the 300D is still going for £200-£250 on fleabay and that is the model before the 350D, the 350D was going for ~£375 at the end of it's life. If that continues when the 400D is replaced in 2 years you're only looking at a ~£125 price difference between the 350D and 400D, if you pay £100 to "upgrade" to the 400D now that £125 difference is only really £25 in 2 years (even less if you take into account inflation, a pound in your pocket now is worth more now than it will in X years ;))

Bodies lose value much faster than lenses, if you're worried about securing your investment in a more stable product price wise glass is the place to put it.

Col
(pseudo finacial adviser) :lol:


Col (short for Colin)

5D+Grip¦24-70L¦50 1.4¦100 2.8 Macro¦Sigma 70-200 EX DG¦430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 05, 2006 07:29 |  #10

Don't get a 400D if you allready own a 350D, unless you want a second body. The 400D has nothing over the 350D making it worth the money spent. Spend the money on glass, accessories or travel instead. That's just MHO off course...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
convergent
Goldmember
Avatar
2,244 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Emerald Isle, NC
     
Oct 05, 2006 07:36 |  #11

Get the nifty-50 (50mm f/1.8). Its cheap, its a great lens, and it will work well with what you are shooting.


Mike
R6 II - RF 100-500L f/4.5-7.1 IS - EF 17-40L f/4 - 24-70L f/2.8 II - 70-200L f/2.8 IS II -
135L f/2 - 100 f/2.8 Macro - Siggy 15 f/2.8 Fisheye - RF TC1.4 - EF TC1.4 II - TC2 III - (2) 600EX-RT - ST-E3-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Juan ­ Zas
Goldmember
Avatar
1,511 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Madrid - ESP
     
Oct 05, 2006 09:39 |  #12

René Damkot wrote in post #2079630 (external link)
Don't get a 400D if you allready own a 350D, unless you want a second body. The 400D has nothing over the 350D making it worth the money spent. Spend the money on glass, accessories or travel instead. That's just MHO off course...

Ditto. 100% agree.

I have the 350D, and my aim is to upgrade next year the body to the next gen if it´s available (40D, 7D, 5Ds, or whatever it will be called) but with real best specs.

The best advise is try to get the best glass you can afford it, that is going to be kept. Bodies changes faster than glasses !!!.


Cheers
Juan
_______________
My Gear
My Photo Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedoc
Member
107 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Oct 05, 2006 09:43 |  #13

I think you should go for the glass instead for the 400D.I am doing it for over 2 years and I am happy.With the difference you could propabil go for the 50 1.4.


Canon 400D+Grip,Canon 50mm MkII f1.8,Canon 17-40mm f4L,Canon 70-200mm f4L.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckie8
Senior Member
Avatar
995 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Wake County, NC
     
Oct 05, 2006 09:49 |  #14

Like they say Canon 50mm f/1.8 is the most affordable lens with good quality but on crop body, I find to narrow for my taste. I recommend you to try out a 28mm, 35mm or maybe even the Sigma 30mm f/1.4


Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,595 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
What prime?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2649 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.