Thanks guys! A few more from the shoot:
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |

m.shalaby Goldmember 3,443 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Thanks guys! A few more from the shoot:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimSchemel Senior Member 333 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: USA More info | May 03, 2011 18:35 | #9707 frederiksenp wrote in post #12341847 Yeah, I pretty much live at f/2 with this lens. ![]() Steve Great portrait! Canon 1DsII / Sony Nex 5N
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | May 03, 2011 18:35 | #9708 m.shalaby, those are great examples of getting good results by stopping down a bit! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
m.shalaby Goldmember 3,443 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2009 More info | May 03, 2011 18:49 | #9709 tonylong wrote in post #12342115 m.shalaby, those are great examples of getting good results by stopping down a bit! thanks - yes, plenty of seperation a f2.0 while keeping your subject mostly in focus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
x_tan Cream of the Crop More info | May 03, 2011 19:13 | #9710 I would like few more strangers' shoots from m.shalaby, please Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 03, 2011 19:17 | #9711 Great pictures! That's the reason I sold my 135 f2L, the 85 1.2L can do even better m.shalaby wrote in post #12342093 Thanks guys! A few more from the shoot:
Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | May 03, 2011 19:32 | #9712 Thanks Harley. Love this image!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | May 03, 2011 19:32 | #9713 ^Excellent work everyone!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phamster Cream of the Crop 6,315 posts Likes: 51 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Purdue - Go Boilers More info | May 03, 2011 22:14 | #9714 Janelle Senior ~ Yellow Flower Patch "Lighting will make or break your photo"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember More info | May 03, 2011 22:17 | #9715 phamster wrote in post #12343294 the lighting here was all faked sun light..] Crazy. Never would have guessed that in a million years. Steve -- Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
s2kennyc Senior Member 849 posts Likes: 249 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Southern CA More info | May 04, 2011 01:55 | #9716 Wow...would have never guessed that was artificial light. Nice creativity. Great work as always Pham -Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
s2kennyc Senior Member 849 posts Likes: 249 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Southern CA More info | May 04, 2011 01:56 | #9717 |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | May 04, 2011 03:36 | #9718 ^Nice work Pham.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
m.shalaby Goldmember 3,443 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2009 More info | May 04, 2011 07:28 | #9719 CanonYouCan wrote in post #12342345 Great pictures! That's the reason I sold my 135 f2L, the 85 1.2L can do even better ![]() Instead of the 135L + 200 2.8L if bought the 70-200 2.8L non IS for more versatility. 35L + 85L stay my bokehlicious portraitlenses! Thanks a lot! I still love my 135L compression vs. the 85L though... its just a tricker lens to use and a bit limiting (headshots, to half body shots), but anything further and I pull out the 85L... both awsome lenses and honestly its hard to tell the two apart.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | May 04, 2011 08:47 | #9720 m.shalaby wrote in post #12344839 Thanks a lot! I still love my 135L compression vs. the 85L though... its just a tricker lens to use and a bit limiting (headshots, to half body shots), but anything further and I pull out the 85L... both awsome lenses and honestly its hard to tell the two apart. I can see the 135L is more pleasing for headshots, more flattering on the subject... ever so slightly. I really like 1 & 4 (I commented at length on another thread) and if you like the 135 you should give the 200 2L a spin. It would work very well in your hands.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1397 guests, 143 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||