Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Oct 2006 (Saturday) 13:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monitor color calibration

 
fi20100
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Oct 07, 2006 13:30 |  #1

As I’m doing both webdesign and photography, I’m in desperate need of color calibrating my monitors. At the moment I’m looking into a ColorVision Spyder2express. Does anyone have any experience of this product?

Can anyone suggest any great alternatives in the same price range... ~ 100 € / $. I would very much appreciate some advice :)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Oct 07, 2006 14:40 |  #2

Coincidentally I've just bought the Spyder 2 today and just finished calibrating my Eizo L768 display (I've just realised even that's an L)):o It's somewhat dependant on the monitor controls as some have more than others available for tweaking the settings.

It didn't make a huge difference but it was visible. So in one way it's comforting to think that I must have set it up reasonably close to optimum manually. I think the main thing is that it should give a known setting to be able to return to. By the looks of it, the major differences between the Spyder express, Spyder 2 and the Spyder Pro seems to be the software with the actual Spyder itself being the same unit. I don't suppose it compares to a true spectrophotometer (we use them at work for colour matching) but they cost a LOT more and it's hardly justifiable for my use.

So... possibly a litte early to comment more, but so far I'm pleased with it and certainly don't regret buying it.

Hope that helps a little anyway,
Cheers
Bill


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Oct 07, 2006 15:38 |  #3

Thanks Bill :) It is great to hear from someone that has got the unit :)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miles
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Oct 08, 2006 02:29 as a reply to  @ fi20100's post |  #4

I got one last week. Works brilliantly. Huge difference in images and now need to redevelop all my raws!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Oct 08, 2006 04:55 |  #5

Miles wrote in post #2091381 (external link)
I got one last week. Works brilliantly. Huge difference in images and now need to redevelop all my raws!!!

It was the ColorVision Spyder2express you got? :)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Oct 09, 2006 00:37 |  #6

Does anyone else have any experience with the ColorVision Spyder2express?


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Oct 09, 2006 03:53 |  #7

As an alternative you might consider the Pantone Huey. Its main advantage is that it has a roomlight sensor that automatically adjusts the display according to the ambient light, which is convenient especially in a home environment where you work both at night and during the day.
Elie


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
triumph
Member
202 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Oct 11, 2006 05:30 |  #8

Have Just purchased and used the spyder2express. Looking good.


Canon 5D + BG-E4 grip + POTN Strap
17-40L, 24-105LIS, 28-135IS, 100-400LIS, 50mm/f1.4 100mm macro, 1.4x converter, 2x550EX flash, Gitzo Tripod G1327 + 1376 Head.
Lowepro Dryzone + billingham 445 bags, flashtrax XT, TC-80N3
Selling;
Manfrotto 441 carbonfibre tripod + manfrotto 488 Head
50mm f1.8 mk1, sigma EX 2x convertor, remote switch RS-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeeJay
Goldmember
Avatar
3,834 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Warwickshire - UK
     
Oct 11, 2006 05:58 |  #9

Another vote for the "Pantone Huey" - couldn't be easier to set up, just hold the sensor to the (LCD) screen (rather than use the built-in suction cups) for a few seconds while it runs through its testing - and job done!

As TZalman said, the room sensor is quite good, adjusting the output based on ambient room light.


1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea :confused:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Oct 11, 2006 06:05 |  #10

Ok thanks :) seems like I just might get to borrow a Spyder 2 from a friend in a week, so I might do that first, to get an idea how it is working :)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 11, 2006 06:11 |  #11

I just looked at the Spyder 2 and it costs around $70. I think I might go out and get one today. My Dell LCD does not match my prints at all so I better get that done soon. I've been compensating and it's driving me nuts!


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Oct 11, 2006 11:14 |  #12

Great! Tell me how you like it when you've got it :)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sladecj
Member
134 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
     
Oct 11, 2006 11:14 as a reply to  @ SuzyView's post |  #13

I just bought the Spyder 2 express, and did my calibration. The change was obvious.

My only concern is that you are supposed to change your monitor back to factory defaults for all settings. I am pretty sure this is a bad idea. I did this and then got what is called "image persistance" or LCD screen burn. My factory default is brightness at %100 and the tool bar etc. started to burn in. This is fixable on and LCD and all is well. But as a result I toned down the brightness and re-calibrated and everything seems to be fine. Not every monitor is the same (has the same default settings) so I don't really se how this should be much of an issue. I suspect some people may just have their monitors so messed up they can be calibrated well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rfreschner
ishka bibble
Avatar
2,576 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Andover, CT...................... Go Red Sox!
     
Oct 11, 2006 16:45 |  #14

Sladecj wrote in post #2106469 (external link)
My only concern is that you are supposed to change your monitor back to factory defaults for all settings. I am pretty sure this is a bad idea. I did this and then got what is called "image persistance" or LCD screen burn. My factory default is brightness at %100 and the tool bar etc. started to burn in.

I don't understand how you would get burn in unless you waited a long time (like months) between changing back to default settings and calibrating. :confused: I just calibrated my monitor with the Spyder2PRO at the default settings and the calibration promptly knocked the brightness down below what I've been running it at for the 6 months I've had it.


Rick
"We both can't be wrong; I must be right"
Bob Welch
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sladecj
Member
134 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
     
Oct 11, 2006 18:23 as a reply to  @ rfreschner's post |  #15

I don't understand. Are you saying the the software changed the brightness controls on your monitor on it's own? Doesn't the software just create a profile for color managed programs to use? The programs uses this profile to adjust things to display correctly on your monitor. I'm I wrong about this? Did you manually change your monitor settings during the calibration?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,487 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Monitor color calibration
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1408 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.