Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Oct 2006 (Monday) 05:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200 f2.8 / f4 sharpness and IQ

 
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Oct 09, 2006 15:27 |  #16

If this helps, I would be comfortable croping to nearly 100% with the 70-200/2.8. Any softness I've encountered is user error, or simply subject movement out of the focus zone before I can catch up (sports are killer =D). It's very sharp at 2.8, and a f/4 it's unreal.


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malla1962
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,714 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk
     
Oct 09, 2006 16:01 as a reply to  @ tsaraleksi's post |  #17

I have the 2.8Lis version and had the f4 and to be honest you would be hard pressed to tell them apart as far as IQ goes,both very good with the 1.4 T-con,but for me Ile take 2.8 over f4 any day.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,190 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Oct 09, 2006 19:20 |  #18

I have both; and they both have their uses. If it's daylight out and I'm going light; I'll bring the F4. If I KNOW it's going to be questionable; I bring the 2.8

Personally I just couldn't spend the extra for the IS version of the 2.8
If I were a Paid Photog for weddings or other gigs; I probably would, but for me the 2.8 has done what I've asked of it so far..


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + R5 with EF->RF adapter, 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,114 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
70-200 f2.8 / f4 sharpness and IQ
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2612 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.