Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 09 Oct 2006 (Monday) 08:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Daytime Long Exposure

 
penfolduk
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 109
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire
     
Oct 09, 2006 08:25 |  #1

I was trying to get a shot of the London Eye using long exposure but it kept on majorly blowing out. I was using a shutter speed of 4 seconds in shutter priority, ISO 100, WB set to cloudy (because it was) and had the AV thingy down to -2.

So my question is what settings should I be using, if indeed it is possible?

Phil


Fuji X-T3
Fuji 16-80mm F4
Viltrox 56mm F1.4
Wish list as long as your arm! and my arm! and my wife's arm! - you get the idea
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 09, 2006 10:35 |  #2

You need an ND filter. 4 seconds is waaay to long a time in daylight, even at f/22. The camera tried to tell you that by blinking the aperture value in the VF ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Oct 09, 2006 10:48 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Well, in this scenario, to avoid majorly overblown shots try using majorly faster shutter speed.. :D

Out of curiosity: Why did you decide to use 4 sec in a broad daylight?
Did you try to achieve some special effect?


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Oct 09, 2006 11:25 |  #4

The special effect he was trying to achieve was probably blur.

The London Eye has a diameter of 121m and rotares once every 30 seconds, so the capsules on the outside are moving at about 0.21m/sec. In a 4-second exposure they'll move by just under 1m. Given that the capsules are about 8m long and 4m in diameter, 1m of movement will probably have a similar effect to taking an OOF photo.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MagicallyDelicious
Goldmember
4,083 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2006
Location: Southport UK
     
Oct 09, 2006 11:28 |  #5

Get an ND filter.

Ive a couple - if you get screw in ones you can add them ontop of each other too.


every mistake is a lesson learned

My Website (external link) Myspace (external link)
Canon 300D 18-55 Kit, Canon 35-80, Canon 50mm 1.8, Sigma 500 DG Super,
Bits n Bobs
RAW FOR DUMMIES

Your Mind Is Like A Parachute.....Only Works When Open.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Oct 09, 2006 12:00 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

StewartR wrote in post #2096776 (external link)
The special effect he was trying to achieve was probably blur.

The London Eye has a diameter of 121m and rotares once every 30 seconds, so the capsules on the outside are moving at about 0.21m/sec. In a 4-second exposure they'll move by just under 1m. Given that the capsules are about 8m long and 4m in diameter, 1m of movement will probably have a similar effect to taking an OOF photo.

Okay, thanks, now it makes sense..


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Oct 09, 2006 16:41 |  #7

Though it would probably be easier just to take the OOF photo in the first place.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
penfolduk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 109
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire
     
Oct 10, 2006 04:14 |  #8

Ok ok so it was a stupid question and you were right about the eye looking out of focus. I went back after work whilst waiting for the missus to finish work and had another go. found that four seconds gave just that effect :(

Still learning, gonna go back with a remote one night this week and try again.

Cheers for answering my stupid question!

Phil


Fuji X-T3
Fuji 16-80mm F4
Viltrox 56mm F1.4
Wish list as long as your arm! and my arm! and my wife's arm! - you get the idea
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 10, 2006 07:32 |  #9

Why not go back in the evening? Then you have less light, so a long time exposure (as in 30 seconds or so) might give you the effect you want.... (motion blurred 'eye')


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StewartR
"your nose is too big"
Avatar
4,269 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Maidenhead, UK
     
Oct 10, 2006 08:46 |  #10

A lomg exposure shot at night - or preferably in the half hour after sunset, while there's still some light in the sky - might look really good because of the way the Eye is illuminated.


www.LensesForHire.co.u​k (external link) - complete with matching POTN discussion thread
Photos: Cats (external link) | London by day (external link) | London by night (external link) I My POTN photo sharing threads (external link) | Official "Where Am I Now?" archive (external link)
Gear: 350D | Sigma 18-200mm | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
penfolduk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
699 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 109
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire
     
Oct 10, 2006 15:54 as a reply to  @ StewartR's post |  #11

Here is a quick attempt i did yesterday evening, 30 second exposure.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Fuji X-T3
Fuji 16-80mm F4
Viltrox 56mm F1.4
Wish list as long as your arm! and my arm! and my wife's arm! - you get the idea
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,965 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Daytime Long Exposure
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1316 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.