Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Oct 2006 (Wednesday) 19:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

50mm 1.2 MTF Chart

 
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Oct 11, 2006 19:00 |  #1

On the Canon website I looked at the MTF chart for the 50 1.4 vs the 50 1.2 and they didn't look significantly different. Looks like not much difference in sharpness? Any experts want to look.


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Oct 11, 2006 19:20 |  #2

Agreed, they look fairly even. The 1.2 has an edge stopped down, but wide open, they seem to have very similar performance.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Oct 11, 2006 19:44 as a reply to  @ Ronald S. Jr.'s post |  #3

Doing my sooth saying reading on the MTF charts.

It would appear that the 50/1.2 would be much better at f8 if you have a 35mm FF camera such as the 5D or 1DsMkII (please note that the blue lines continue out farther to the right side of the MTF chart. But I note that on a APS-C camera you would not see a significant difference.

Meanwhile at F1.2 (the black lines) the 50/1.2 clearly out performs the 50/1.4 as it can't go there :)

However, extrapolating (ignoring for the moment that I would much rather have the 85/1.2L at f1.2) I note that again the 50/1.2 at F1.4 would probably hold it sharpness and contrast better overall then the 50/1.4 does at f1.4 out to the corners where it would make a difference again only to a 35mm FF camera (such as the 5D or the 1DsMkII)

Lastly ignoring the Bokeh, the minor color difference and the better build that would show up between the 50/1.2 and the 50/1.4, I would have to argue with the fact that based solely on the MTF charts I see no advantage in getting the 50/1.2 over the 50/1.4 if I had an APS-C sensor (such as the ###D or ##D series DSLRs) it would be close if it would make a difference to an APS-H camera such as the 1DM2N.

Just my opinion, but I am a trained imagery analyst.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 11, 2006 19:49 |  #4

morehtml wrote in post #2108344 (external link)
On the Canon website I looked at the MTF chart for the 50 1.4 vs the 50 1.2 and they didn't look significantly different. Looks like not much difference in sharpness? Any experts want to look.

You are up to something no good here, aren't you ?;)


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:02 |  #5

Petkal wrote in post #2108503 (external link)
You are up to something no good here, aren't you ?;)

Based on the charts I am backing off on buying the 50 1.2. Just doesn't look to be much different and the f stop difference is not of major significance. But I read somewhere the Canon Mtf's are based on some thoretical and not actual test performance.


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:06 |  #6

morehtml wrote in post #2108556 (external link)
Based on the charts I am backing off on buying the 50 1.2

OK, if you think your copy is soft, sell it then to Dante.....he couldn't tell a difference anyways....plus he is looking to buy one.:D


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:08 |  #7

On the other hand the 85mm 1.2L II seems to show noticable improvement over the 85mm 1.8 MTF charts.


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:09 |  #8

Petkal wrote in post #2108573 (external link)
OK, if you think your copy is soft, sell it then to Dante.....he couldn't tell a difference anyways....plus he is looking to buy one.:D

He'll have his in his hands before I can press 'add to cart' :lol:


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:17 |  #9

morehtml wrote in post #2108583 (external link)
On the other hand the 85mm 1.2L II seems to show noticable improvement over the 85mm 1.8 MTF charts.

That's a crock of bovine excrement, methinks.
I fear Nikon hacks might have hijacked that site with MTF charts.....trying to inseminate vexation into the souls of Canon photographers.


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:22 |  #10

Petkal wrote in post #2108624 (external link)
That's a crock of bovine excrement, methinks.
I fear Nikon hacks might have hijacked that site with MTF charts.....trying to inseminate vexation into the souls of Canon photographers.

Then the 50 1.2 chart might look worse than the 50 1.4. Unfortuantly probably the only way to sort this out is to buy one and compare the 2 in the flesh side by side. Not sure if I want to do that $1600 test!


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:24 |  #11

morehtml wrote in post #2108649 (external link)
Then the 50 1.2 chart might look worse than the 50 1.4. Unfortuantly probably the only way to sort this out is to buy one and compare the 2 in the flesh side by side. Not sure if I want to do that $1600 test!

Right you are...that's what the 14 day return store policy is for.;)


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
incendy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:32 |  #12

The 50 1.4 is one of the sharpest lenses canon makes in the center. In fact it outresolves pretty much everything in the center but the edges are very weak in comparison. I don't think there was ever any question about the 50 1.4's sharpness, but it is the contrast and saturation everyone complains about. Just my two cents


Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/incendy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:38 |  #13

incendy wrote in post #2108696 (external link)
The 50 1.4 is one of the sharpest lenses canon makes in the center.

....in the aperture range from f/2.8 and stopped down from there.

Yes, I'd agree with that.


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:51 as a reply to  @ PetKal's post |  #14

A more practical question which really comes first to my little mind is: Where is the darn lens ?

My camera store in Toronto now tell me they/I will have it by the end of October. A few weeks ago when I oredered it it was "Early October".
C'mon Canon USA/Canada, let's get the lead out !


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
incendy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County
     
Oct 11, 2006 20:51 |  #15

Petkal wrote in post #2108718 (external link)
....in the aperture range from f/2.8 and stopped down from there.

Yes, I'd agree with that.

Actually even at 1.4 it outresolves most any lens, Even the 85 1.2 although it is shooting at 1.2. It matches and beats the 85 1.2 at everything actually, so I don't see why this is a bad thing that that 1.2 matches it in mtf charts


Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/incendy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,693 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
50mm 1.2 MTF Chart
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2774 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.