ashmicek Member  134 posts Joined Jul 2006 More info | Oct 12, 2006 09:27 | #1 My best Friend Sheena and her Fiance asked if I could take their engagement photos for them. After some photoshop these two are my favorite:   Ashley
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saralonde Goldmember 1,019 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Pennsylvania More info | Oct 12, 2006 11:22 | #2 I'm not too good with PS, but I'm sure you can correct those spots of light in the first photo. I like the second photo, but they look too washed out. It seems way over exposed. Maybe someone with more PS experience can tell you how to correct these.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop  6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | Oct 12, 2006 12:36 | #3 First one looks nice but the second is definately overexposed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop 6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | I had a quick go at it in PS....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zacker Cream of the Crop  6,006 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Oxford, CT. More info | Oct 12, 2006 12:44 | #5 i like the second one but unfortunatly i think you need to re-do it... a re-shoot for that one definetly. http://www.theanimalhaven.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Familia Senior Member 638 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Phx, Az More info | Oct 12, 2006 12:48 | #6 I also tried to ps the second one....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amonline Goldmember  3,558 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 More info | Oct 12, 2006 15:01 | #7 Holy overexposure batman! What did you meter off of?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sterling30D Member 46 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Here's my quick attempt at Photoshopping it. Does it look any better?
Canon EOS 30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop 6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | Oct 12, 2006 16:20 | #9 You did a nice job on that last one Sterling.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lisa1969 Senior Member 819 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: Canada More info | Oct 12, 2006 16:37 | #10 Shooting in full sun is such a pain. Was the second shot already post processed? If not could we see the original? I hope you dont mind but I tried a quick correction in PS as well. Ok this is looking a little too colorful on here but with the original image you could do a lot more.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NormF Member 165 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Saskatoon, SK Canada More info | Duplicate layer set to Multiply. Erased faces on top layer with about 7% opacity.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Norm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop  More info | Oct 12, 2006 17:28 | #12 On #2 - apply a gradient tool w/color burn, opacity about 60% from top to bottom - repeat as needed. Works well without over saturating the bottom of the image. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cforslund Member 85 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Denver, CO More info | My 30sec attempt.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NormF Member 165 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Saskatoon, SK Canada More info | Oct 12, 2006 20:02 | #14
Norm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Oct 12, 2006 21:21 | #15  Permanent banUgh. Horrible lighting. In a portrait you shouldn't really have any portion of your frame brighter than your subject. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2736 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
