See what I look at is her skin tones. My original post is right on. She is very light skinned. The darker post seem to add weird redness... Bob I like yours much more than Craig's
Rhinotherunt THREAD STARTER Looking for a Rock 7,129 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Jasper, AL More info | Oct 21, 2006 12:03 | #31 See what I look at is her skin tones. My original post is right on. She is very light skinned. The darker post seem to add weird redness... Bob I like yours much more than Craig's Ryan McGill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KaylaNicole Member 79 posts Joined Feb 2006 Location: OKC,OK More info | Oct 21, 2006 13:13 | #32 I'm not a fan of the pole...I think it takes away from her beauty!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
D.CraigFlory Goldmember 1,333 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Ryan; D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
whiskaz Goldmember 1,503 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Parkersburg, WV More info | Oct 21, 2006 14:09 | #34 Craig, easy there pro. While I agree the original seems a tad overexposed, there's no need to get mean about it. Jeremy | Gear List | EyeDigress - A Photoblog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Texbow Member 150 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Cypress, Texas More info | Oct 21, 2006 18:14 | #35 I'm not qualified to input on the technical debate but I think your model has the "girl next door" look. To me a good photo is more then the techical aspects. IMHO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rhinotherunt THREAD STARTER Looking for a Rock 7,129 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Jasper, AL More info | Oct 21, 2006 18:21 | #36 D. Craig Flory wrote in post #2150022 Ryan; If your original post is "right on", she must be never out in the sun. Her skin on your post, on my monitor, is just a shade above my white ink jet paper. I'm calibrated for my pro lab and am on a Viewsonic Professional Series Monitor. My images always look great on several Professional Photographer sites. So I will assume you should calibrate your monitor. But I am be wrong ... have only been a full time pro portrait photographer since 1966. So I really suggest strongly that you get calibrated and get your gamma set. D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Photographic Craftsman, ASP loryphotog@mindspring.com LOL! To each is their own. My GF wants to give you a piece of her mind... Oh, I checked out your website.... ummm... interesting. whiskaz wrote in post #2150118 Craig, easy there pro. While I agree the original seems a tad overexposed, there's no need to get mean about it. Thanks! He is not offending me. He is offering me "pro" advice, Texbow wrote in post #2150971 I'm not qualified to input on the technical debate but I think your model has the "girl next door" look. To me a good photo is more then the techical aspects. IMHO. Thanks Tex! Ryan McGill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2692 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||