Went to Northern Wisconsin last week. Shot this from a boat with the 400mm at f8 and 1/1600 ISO 800. C&C welcome.
rathke Senior Member 962 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Humble, TX More info | Oct 13, 2006 22:44 | #1 Went to Northern Wisconsin last week. Shot this from a boat with the 400mm at f8 and 1/1600 ISO 800. C&C welcome. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohanGroenewald Senior Member 688 posts Likes: 4 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Johannesburg More info | Oct 13, 2006 22:56 | #2 Great colours, good shot , little bit blurry, guess thats from the boat's movement [50D][Canon 70-200 f4L][Canon 17-55 2.8IS][Canon 100L macro]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rendezvous Goldmember 1,183 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Tauranga, New Zealand More info | Oct 14, 2006 01:15 | #3 I don't see you getting blur from boat movement at 1/1600! (unless it's a reeaally fast boat). It could just be the processing that's left it a bit soft/blurry, but I think there's some nice subjects in it. The trees down here don't look like that, it's more of green leaves, then brown leaves then no leaves. We don't seem to get the lovely oranges and reds. danieltalbotPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asolie Pigeon Queen 4,941 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Locating customers for the Pigeon Cafe. More info | Oct 14, 2006 01:26 | #4 |
I'm concerned with the blurry look. Maybe the windy condition is a cause? I processed again with less saturation. What do you think? _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop 29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Oct 14, 2006 12:26 | #6 I like the first try. My old eyes didn't notice any blur, just great color. Nice to see the 400mm used as a landscape lens. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReighHiggins Goldmember 3,036 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Nova Scotia , Canada More info | Oct 14, 2006 12:49 | #7 Beautiful colours Rathke . Thanks for sharing. " This world is a canvas to our imagination."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sdearth Member 35 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Raleigh, NC More info | Oct 14, 2006 12:54 | #8 rathke wrote in post #2118941 I'm concerned with the blurry look. Maybe the windy condition is a cause? I processed again with less saturation. What do you think? ![]() I don't see any blurring that distracts from your first effort. Maybe some USM would help, but just a touch. I think it's great and really captures some fine color.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2806 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||