I would have to have something wider than 17mm for landscapes, so my vote is for the 10-22 EFS.
chtgrubbs Goldmember 1,675 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Oct 15, 2006 12:03 | #16 I would have to have something wider than 17mm for landscapes, so my vote is for the 10-22 EFS.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AccidentalArt Senior Member 616 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Houston areas More info | I just got the Tamron 17-50 2.8 and seem to like it so far. 7D, RebelXT, 30D, 50mm 1.8, 85mm 1.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro, Sigma 1.4x TC, Tamron 17-50 2.8, Metz 54, 100-400IS, Kenko Ext Tube Set, 24-70 2.8, 180mm Macro, (2) GoPro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2769 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||