Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 16 Oct 2006 (Monday) 12:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Domke Satchel Question

 
Pinto
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Oct 16, 2006 12:50 |  #1

Haven't had a hands-on, just looking on-line so far.
My question is why the smaller Domke F803 (9x13x4) is more expensive than the larger F802, (12X15x4)?
Is there difference in construction?
Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lmitch6
Senior Member
539 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: California
     
Oct 16, 2006 16:22 |  #2

The F-803 comes with inserts, and is better suited to holding a camera system, while theF-802, is more of a laptop bag from what I understand. I have the J-803 (the ballistic nylon version of the F-803), and really like it.


Galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Oct 16, 2006 17:34 |  #3

Thanks, Imitch6.
If the 802 doesn't have inserts, the price difference makes sense.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Oct 16, 2006 20:15 |  #4

I too have the J-803. I'm a good sized guy (read: old but tough) and it can hold all the gear I would ever want to carry around at one time. It is built tough. I compared it to the Crumpler and it came out way on top. Tougher build, better colour (though this is personal, I just don't care for fuzzy powder blue or lime green interiors) and better design. I really like mine too.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Oct 17, 2006 10:41 |  #5

Thanks Jim. I'm interested in the satchel type because of the "not a camera bag" look, and because of that, I thought I would carry it more frequently.
I was looking at the larger 802 because it appeared the 70-200 2.8 would fit, but I now think that lens might be too big to drag around in this type of bag.
I think the 803 and the 24-105 with extras is the way I will go.
I'm with you on the Crumpler bags. Haven't seen one I didn't think looked like a woman's purse. Must be because I getting old too.
Thank you for the response.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Oct 17, 2006 11:28 |  #6

I often carry my camera and all lenses in my sig with the exception of the 100-400 and the Peleng (which is enroute) as well as my flash. When I go to the zoo I take the 100-400, and leave the 70-200 and 10-22 behind.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Oct 17, 2006 12:04 |  #7

Thanks. Jim. Sounds good. I'll give it a go.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Cult of the Full Frame
     
Oct 17, 2006 20:25 |  #8

The Domke looks a little bit more suited to work environments. Nobody suspects I'm carrying my camera gear and headed out to shoot after hours :D a true 'stealth' bag....even in corporate! I use it as my 'sack of all trades', the ultimate messenger bag IMO. It'll swallow TWO 17" laptops (and break my shoulder, so this has never actually been carried) easily.

I chose it over the smaller F-803 even though I only had a 350D when I bought it. Now I stuff a big zoom (300 f/4L IS or Sigma 70-200) in it, my ultrawide 17-40, 24-105 and 5D. Still has room for one more medium sized lens (17-40 size). Magnificent bag. I can STILL stick a 14" screen laptop into the rear compartment, too! But again, shoulders don't like it, so I use the Computrekker for that purpose.

You definitely want the 'height' of the bigger one if carrying a large lens face down. Especially with a teleconverter mounted.

Get the optional two-section divider. Your camera (with lens mounted) will go face down into one section, the other one will hold a small lens. The big open space will hold your big lens. Unfortunately, I bought the 3-section not realizing that some day I would upgrade to things like the 1D, which would fit nicely.

Oh well, not too late. I can still pick up the divider some other day, or make one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Oct 18, 2006 10:14 |  #9

Thanks, Lightstream, for the detailed response.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,834 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Domke Satchel Question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
913 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.