need your help guys. what should i get this christmas? a 20d camera or a 24 - 70 2.8L lens. thanks in advance!
regards
cleng
clengster_77 Senior Member 613 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Philippines More info | Oct 17, 2006 06:47 | #1 need your help guys. what should i get this christmas? a 20d camera or a 24 - 70 2.8L lens. thanks in advance! Canon 5D x 2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
homera1 Senior Member 389 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Chippenham, Wilts, UK More info | Oct 17, 2006 07:25 | #2 lens lens lens lens lens Canon1Ds mkII, 5D+grip|EF 16-35 f2.8 | 24-70 f2.8 | 70-200 f2.8 | 135mm f2 | 85mm f1.2 | 35mm f1.4 | L's | 50mm f1.4|EXT 2x II|580EX|Kata R103 |Elinchrom - x5 Classic EL500's + stuff |Epson R2400 |Gitzo 1549 Tripod, Arca Swiss Z1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 17, 2006 07:33 | #3 thanks homera1! that's what i was thinking too but i need more help that's why i posted this question. Canon 5D x 2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BearLeeAlive All butt cheeks and string. 30,200 posts Likes: 70 Joined May 2005 Location: Calgary, AB More info | Oct 17, 2006 08:06 | #4 In our house I never know what I am getting for Christmas it is part of the fun let alone get to decide what is bought for me. -JIM-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 17, 2006 20:07 | #5 Are you asking what to get me for Christmas? I'll PM you a list. Hint: it's all Canon. I hope you have been saving up. $$$$$ Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sugarzebra Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 17, 2006 20:11 | #6 I would recommend the lens without hesitation, whether it be the 24-70 or 24-105 you cant go wrong. Merry Christmas! Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
myself621 Member 59 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico More info | Personally, I'd check out the Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG. I know it's not an L, and it focuses slighty slower, but as long as you're willing to send one back in the rare case that you get a bad copy or it needs calibration, I think it's worth the $720 in savings to put toward either a new body or a 70-200 2.8L. Just my theory. I shoot people.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JaertX Goldmember 2,018 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Amarillo, Texas More info | Oct 17, 2006 22:00 | #9 come on...you're due for a good prime! You have from 17mm to 200mm covered pretty well. How about the 35mm L? Jason - I use Canon and stuff
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 17, 2006 22:18 | #10 right now, i'm not considering prime lenses since i only have 1 body and might miss the flexibility of a zoom lens but i heard good stories bout that 35mmL Canon 5D x 2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Oct 17, 2006 22:25 | #11 clengster_77 wrote in post #2134692 right now, i'm not considering prime lenses since i only have 1 body and might miss the flexibility of a zoom lens but i heard good stories bout that 35mmL @brad i have the 70 - 200 2.8L non IS version @myself621 i've tried a few sigma 24 - 70 2.8. they make good pictures too ![]() yep you need a good f2.8 mid-zoom first, which will be fast enough for some low light and creative work. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2883 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||