And you wanted to replace your 18-55 lens kits with a better everyday lens, what would you get?
(Using mostly for portraits, indoor and outdoor) I already have the nifty fifty and I love it, but I want something similar but with more of a range.
carriel_miller Member 164 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Michigan More info | Oct 18, 2006 14:48 | #1 And you wanted to replace your 18-55 lens kits with a better everyday lens, what would you get?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OrionD Junior Member 21 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Mumbai - India More info | Oct 18, 2006 14:58 | #2 Get the Sigma 17 - 70mm f2.8 - 4.5 DC Macro. I think its a brilliant lens, it gives you much better quality, is almost an entire stop faster, and even gives you a close up 1:2.3 vs the 18-55's 1:3.6 350D + Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 DC Macro
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AeroSmith Goldmember More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:00 | #3 EF 100 f/2 is an absolutely fabulous lens. I just sold a virtually new one on eBay for just a bit over $250. Josh Smith
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillRoberts revolting peasant 3,079 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: UK More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:09 | #4 I think I'd go for the 85mm f/1.8. From what I've seen of it it's a very good lens and excellent value for money. I'm sure with a bit of looking around you'd pick one up in top class condition within your budget. BiLL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
angryhampster "Got a thick monopod?" 3,860 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2006 Location: Iowa More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:12 | #5 I would save another $100 and get a Sigma 24-70mm. Steve Lexa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sirsloop BigFoot 943 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2006 Location: South River, NJ More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:30 | #6 the nifty fifty is a perfect for portrait work with a APS-C body. Maybe not as good at getting close at places like the zoo, but still a nice walk around lens. Super light, compact, and sharp as heck. no gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:34 | #7 Save up until you have $420-450 and buy the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TMRDesign Cream of the Crop 23,883 posts Likes: 12 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Huntington Station, NY More info | You might find the Sigma 17-70mm used for $250 but I just ordered one new and it was $365. Unless you are buying used I don't think there is a replacement for the kit in the $250 price range. I would agree with others and say you should wait a little, save another $100 or so and then get a nicer lens, either Sigma or Tamron. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
steved110 Cream of the Crop 5,776 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: East Sussex UK More info | Keep saving - you won't get anything better or more versatile than the kit lens for that kind of money. If you have to get something - a feeling I empathise with all too well - get the 50 1.8. Canon 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sirsloop BigFoot 943 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2006 Location: South River, NJ More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:45 | #10 so the verdict is, get yourself a 5.05% savings account?? no gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Oct 18, 2006 15:54 | #11 carriel_miller wrote in post #2137563 And you wanted to replace your 18-55 lens kits with a better everyday lens, what would you get? (Using mostly for portraits, indoor and outdoor) I already have the nifty fifty and I love it, but I want something similar but with more of a range. i'd get the canon 24-85. i had one and it's a pretty good walkaround. you have the WA covered with your kit lens. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sirsloop BigFoot 943 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2006 Location: South River, NJ More info | Oct 18, 2006 16:02 | #12 After owning a bunch of consumer zoom lenses, I'm not really impressed. I've sold them all and filled my case with a variety of inexpensive smoking fast sharp primes. Canon makes a bunch of them as long as you can live without FTMF and USM. no gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for everyones opinions...now i have some researching to do!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
braduardo Goldmember 2,630 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Minneapolis, MN More info | Oct 19, 2006 15:55 | #14 Check the 28-105 USM... Not too bad...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saravrose "I quit smoking dope" 9,562 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Between here and there More info | Oct 19, 2006 16:04 | #15 Wilt wrote in post #2137736 Save up until you have $420-450 and buy the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 I found my tammy for $300 and I agree with you completely. It's a fabulous lens... Canon 30D BG_E2 Grip Rebel XT BG-E3 battery grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2873 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||