Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Oct 2006 (Wednesday) 18:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

WOWZERS! the 85L f/1.2 is unbelieveable........

 
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:07 |  #46

Cathpah wrote in post #2145583 (external link)
Just another tool of the trade that will help allow me to capture a photo as I see it in my head.

I like your style son but I have to say if you see that kind of fuzzy stuff in your head well it's time to invest in a decent pair of spectacles rather than a new lens :p


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tsaraleksi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,653 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:10 |  #47

Montec wrote in post #2142380 (external link)
This effect is beautiful...but the cost of these lenses are out of this world and 99% of photographers will never get to use something like this.

I realize that this will probably get some negative responses but without too much skill involved one can do this in PhotoShop and you could not tell the difference. So for all of us that will never own such a fine piece of equipment we can still get the same results.

That's a pretty snazzy way to get yourself in a ton of trouble with any kind of journalism organization, or to simply have really crappy looking pictures. I have yet to see Photoshop bokeh that's even in the same league as the real deal. So you really can't get "the same" results. Just because he has something you can't afford/won't pay for doesn't mean that you have to make up reasons that he's wasting money while you are the careful consumer.


--Alex Editorial Portfolio (external link)
|| Elan 7ne+BG ||5D mk. II ||1D mk. II N || EF 17-40 F4L ||EF 24-70 F2.8L||EF 35 1.4L || EF 85 1.2L ||EF 70-200 2.8L|| EF 300 4L IS[on loan]| |Speedlite 580EX || Nikon Coolscan IV ED||

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:14 |  #48

condyk wrote in post #2145615 (external link)
I like your style son but I have to say if you see that kind of fuzzy stuff in your head well it's time to invest in a decent pair of spectacles rather than a new lens :p

In the entire process of seeing, perception and cognition, a decent pair of spectacles have a rather limited remedial role.;) :lol:


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
incendy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:16 |  #49

I would like you to test it on Jessica Alba please!

Congratulations!! Awesome lens for sure


Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/incendy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:21 |  #50

Petkal wrote in post #2145641 (external link)
In the entire process of seeing, perception and cognition, a decent pair of spectacles have a rather limited remedial role.;) :lol:

Who need good bloke-eh in a lens and Gusset Blur in Photoshop when you can just lose your specs? From experience life can certainly become more creative, especially in a midnight bar in backstreet Bangcock :shock: -? -? :shock: apparently!


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cathpah
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,259 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Maine.
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:22 |  #51

incendy wrote in post #2145646 (external link)
I would like you to test it on Jessica Alba please!

I would ALSO like to test on Jessica Alba. you set it up and I'll be there!!
thanks ahead of time. :)


Architecture (external link) | Fashion + Beauty (external link) | Travel (external link) | Mayhem (external link) | Instagram (external link)
tools of the trade
My name is Jeff, and I'm addicted to shadows in fashion and brights in architecture. "Hiiiiii Jeff."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:23 |  #52

Whoa, I get the same effect when I take my contacts out! LOL! I would LUV to own this lens and the 200 1.8!!! :)


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:46 |  #53

condyk wrote in post #2145665 (external link)
Who need good bloke-eh in a lens and Gusset Blur in Photoshop when you can just lose your specs? From experience life can certainly become more creative, especially in a midnight bar in backstreet Bangcock :shock: -? -? :shock: apparently!

Or in a communal igloo somewhere in Laprador.
Either way, I think Cathopathy's keg copy appears to be good.....notwithstandi​ng very pronounced purple fringing which however appears to be within the keg's design envelope and copy-to-copy variability.;)


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:53 |  #54

Petkal wrote in post #2145791 (external link)
...notwithstanding very pronounced purple fringing which however appears to be within the keg's design envelope and copy-to-copy variability.;)

Oh ... I always thought that was a creative addition PS'd in to the overall composition, rather like the radioactive glow some talented shooters impose on their in-flight Eagle/Hawk and Gull/Pigeon shots. So, it is an exclusive Canon design feature then? That will keep those rebel Sigma and Tampax lenses from the L gates for a while longer.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Oct 20, 2006 11:00 |  #55

condyk wrote in post #2145812 (external link)
Oh ... I always thought that was a creative addition PS'd in to the overall composition, rather like the radioactive glow some talented shooters impose on their in-flight Eagle/Hawk and Gull/Pigeon shots. So, it is an exclusive Canon design feature then? That will keep those rebel Sigma and Tampax lenses from the L gates for a while longer.

When talking about the KEG, I would not go as far as calling it a "design feature".....however I feel it can be classified as "design tolerance".....i.e., the users tolerate it and probably find a workaround eventually.
It's a sort of a collateral of having the f/1.2 aperture........we shall see soon what fringe "benefits" will the 50 f/1.2 offer to their users.:D


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
busterboy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,436 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire Born n Bred.
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:34 as a reply to  @ PetKal's post |  #56

Congrats on the new lens, Yes they are something special.;)

Don't be too dismayed into thinking the AF is a slouch, Here is a good portrait followed by an action shot with the same lens.. 85mm f/1.2L

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

[COLOR=blue][COLOR=bla​ck][COLOR=blue]| Canon 1DMkIII | 16-35mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200mm F/2.8L IS | Canon 1.4X Extender | Canon 2X Extender |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:36 |  #57

Great images Tim


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,202 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
WOWZERS! the 85L f/1.2 is unbelieveable........
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2770 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.