Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 19 Oct 2006 (Thursday) 22:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

National Geographic Medium Shoulder Bag Review

 
<AkulA>
Goldmember
Avatar
2,038 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tacoma, Washington
     
May 31, 2007 13:21 |  #151

I was out at some waterfalls yesterday, and I had to explain to about 10 different people that, no - I don't shoot for National Geographic, LoL.

I also catch a lot of crap from fellow photographers at school for the logo, LoL.

Another thing I could see wrong, is that in the bad part of town, or a 3rd world county - people will recognize National Geographic, and think there a lot of really expensive stuff inside (and usually there is!) If there was something else, or no patch at all - it would just look like a regular courier bag. I'm thinking of covering mine.


-Brandon-

Gear - Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
May 31, 2007 14:30 |  #152

<AkulA> wrote in post #3297925 (external link)
Another thing I could see wrong, is that in the bad part of town, or a 3rd world county - people will recognize National Geographic, and think there a lot of really expensive stuff inside (and usually there is!)

Just say that it's full of old National Geographic magazines. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
71kgb
Member
64 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Bromyard, Herefordshire
     
Jun 03, 2007 10:31 |  #153

Citizensmith wrote in post #3296925 (external link)
Actually this was something that was discussed earlier in the thread.

Must have missed that one somewhere along the line. My apologies.

Citizensmith wrote in post #3296925 (external link)
My solution was put the pouch that comes in the bag at one end and use the spare divider at the other

The one I had did not come with any dividers other than the 'box' insert.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
<AkulA>
Goldmember
Avatar
2,038 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Tacoma, Washington
     
Jun 03, 2007 13:54 |  #154

71kgb wrote in post #3312320 (external link)
The one I had did not come with any dividers other than the 'box' insert.

Mine was the same as yours...


-Brandon-

Gear - Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Jun 03, 2007 19:53 |  #155

71kgb wrote in post #3312320 (external link)
Must have missed that one somewhere along the line. My apologies.

The one I had did not come with any dividers other than the 'box' insert.

I think the OP was referring to extra dividers left over from other bags. I have done the same on different bags.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spyraling
Senior Member
Avatar
368 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jul 14, 2007 11:37 as a reply to  @ Pinto's post |  #156

I have been eyeing this bag for a few weeks because of this thread. (Originally I had my sight set on the Crumpler 7 million dollar home.) I found the National Geographic medium shoulder bag at adorama through amazon yesterday for only $85. It was $100 everywhere else I looked. So I made the purchase today. I can't wait for it to arrive!


Mary

XTi + BG-E3 l 50 f/1.8 l 85 f/1.8 l 18-55 kit lens l Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 l Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 l 430ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Jul 14, 2007 21:10 |  #157

spyraling wrote in post #3543642 (external link)
I have been eyeing this bag for a few weeks because of this thread. (Originally I had my sight set on the Crumpler 7 million dollar home.) I found the National Geographic medium shoulder bag at adorama through amazon yesterday for only $85. It was $100 everywhere else I looked. So I made the purchase today. I can't wait for it to arrive!

I too have been looking at this bag for awhile. I have the small and the midi and like them both. I hope however, that you are aware that people who have ordered this bag report that the 16.5"X7.8"X11.8" dimensions that are published everywhere are incorrect, and the actual dimensions are 13"x 8"x 11".




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jul 14, 2007 21:29 as a reply to  @ Pinto's post |  #158

I've been looking at this bag myself. I currently have a Lowepro Micro Trekker 200 and it's great but I've discovered over time that the backpack really only works for me if I'm hiking or out on a walk as opposed to shooting an event, parade, fair, etc. I change lenses quite a bit and the backpack just doesn't cut it for that.

So now I'm in search of a bag and since my gear has changed and grown in size I have different needs.

There are so many bags out there and the problem is I like to touch and feel things before buying. I do have a local store that has some bags but not the assortment I would want to check out. They do have NG and Lowepro primarily.

Trying to find the right bag is so hard. The NG bags keep catching my eye. I don't know how I'll decide, but I'm not in a real hurry, so I'll keep on reading and see what other people think. I've read so many "what bag to get" threads it's a little overwhelming.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,387 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Jul 15, 2007 15:07 |  #159

Been using my NatGeo Medium on vacation and its been great. I've had my camera, 24 2.8 and 85 1.8 in the pouch, and then vacationy stuff (kids jackets, souvenirs, snacks, drinks, whatever) in the other part of the main body. Maps, passports, tickets and such went in the big back pocket, and then 1st aid kit, pens, phone, in the front zip pockets.

It really did work great, and was left untouched by a group of Paris pickpockets that got two wallets from our group. The only negative with the bag is that the shoulder strap does get uncomfortable with heavy weights. I added a padded strap from my Crumpler bag and it made a big difference and perfectly manageable.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spyraling
Senior Member
Avatar
368 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jul 15, 2007 15:54 |  #160

Pinto wrote in post #3545772 (external link)
...the 16.5"X7.8"X11.8" dimensions that are published everywhere are incorrect, and the actual dimensions are 13"x 8"x 11".

Yeah, I came across that info while researching the bag. I'm looking at a tape measurer in front of me right now and the 13" to 16.5" is kind of a big difference. However, looking at all the pictures I've found here and elsewhere of the bag loaded with gear, I'm pretty happy with what it looks like it can hold. One of the main reasons I chose this bag over the Crumpler is all the pockets it has. I like pockets. :)


Mary

XTi + BG-E3 l 50 f/1.8 l 85 f/1.8 l 18-55 kit lens l Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 l Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 l 430ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pinto
Always in our hearts and minds. R.I.P.
Avatar
3,124 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 272
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
     
Jul 15, 2007 17:21 |  #161

Citizensmith wrote in post #3549297 (external link)
Been using my NatGeo Medium on vacation and its been great. I've had my camera, 24 2.8 and 85 1.8 in the pouch, and then vacationy stuff (kids jackets, souvenirs, snacks, drinks, whatever) in the other part of the main body. Maps, passports, tickets and such went in the big back pocket, and then 1st aid kit, pens, phone, in the front zip pockets.

It really did work great, and was left untouched by a group of Paris pickpockets that got two wallets from our group. The only negative with the bag is that the shoulder strap does get uncomfortable with heavy weights. I added a padded strap from my Crumpler bag and it made a big difference and perfectly manageable.

Glad you like it. I ordered one before I discovered the dimensions error. Should be here tomorrow. I have the small and the midi, figured I'd get the entire set.
Bags will be the death of me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pooky125
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Aug 13, 2007 11:57 |  #162

Because of this post, I went and bought one. I love it. It's a little big for my needs but it gets the job done in a pinch.

I live in Oregon and was a little leary about it surviving with the weather here. Needless to say, after yesterday, all worries are completely gone. I was out at one of the local waterfalls taking pictures out on the rocks, and slipped in with it unzipped. I walked away pretty banged up, but the camera and lenses worked great. Not a scratch anywhere. A little water splashed on, but nothing that will do long term damage.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,387 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Aug 13, 2007 12:02 |  #163

pooky125 wrote in post #3719592 (external link)
Because of this post, I went and bought one. I love it. It's a little big for my needs but it gets the job done in a pinch.

I live in Oregon and was a little leary about it surviving with the weather here. Needless to say, after yesterday, all worries are completely gone. I was out at one of the local waterfalls taking pictures out on the rocks, and slipped in with it unzipped. I walked away pretty banged up, but the camera and lenses worked great. Not a scratch anywhere. A little water splashed on, but nothing that will do long term damage.

Good to hear, glad you and your kit are OK too.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spyraling
Senior Member
Avatar
368 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Aug 13, 2007 12:19 |  #164

pooky125 wrote in post #3719592 (external link)
Because of this post, I went and bought one.

Me, too! I will soon be broke if I continue reading these forums here. ;)

I've had my bag for several weeks now, and I absolutely love it! It is a little roomy when I don't carry all of my kit with me, but currently that spare bit of room is occupied by some Cup O'Noodles, a can of Campbell's Chicken Noodle Soup and an 8-pack of mini Reese's Crispy Crunchy Bars. It's nice having room for other things sometimes.


Mary

XTi + BG-E3 l 50 f/1.8 l 85 f/1.8 l 18-55 kit lens l Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 l Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 l 430ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KeithLaFaille
Member
76 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: CT, USA
     
Sep 23, 2007 22:45 |  #165

I just want to chime in and sing praises for this camera bag. I brought it out for the first time this past Friday and it worked beautifully. In it I carried a 20D w/grip, 70-200 F/2.8L IS, 1.4x Canon Tele, 16-35 2.8L II, and miscellaneous gear all day with no problems at all. After about six or seven hours of walking around the weight of the gear did start to take it's toll on my shoulder, but the well padded strap did its part very nicely.

I also managed to test out the padding of this bag when the bag with all the above mentioned contents in it tipped and fell approx 4 feet to the asphalt ground. I carry the bag with the main flap flipped over and against my body for easy access to the main compartments and this is how the bag was when it fell, landing flap down. Everything survived as though nothing had happened so even though the bag appears to be somewhat sparsely padded, it was more than adequate to save me from a potentially expensive "oh ****" moment.

Great bag, highly recommended.

K


My Photos @ flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

84,192 views & 1 like for this thread, 43 members have posted to it.
National Geographic Medium Shoulder Bag Review
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1688 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.