Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 20 Oct 2006 (Friday) 08:44
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Have you ever needed to use your back-up due to the death of your main body?"
YES
25
46.3%
NO never
29
53.7%

54 voters, 54 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Have you ever needed your 2nd body?

 
Padawan ­ Dad
Senior Member
Avatar
908 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Melrose, MA
     
Oct 20, 2006 08:44 |  #1

... due to failure of your main body ON THE JOB? Just curious how many photographers ever needed to break out the second body due to death of the main body :D


Bill Hicks Photography (external link)

Nikon D700 • 50 ƒ/1.4G • 24-70 ƒ/2.8 • 70-200 ƒ/2.8 VRII SB900  iMac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
song4themoon
Goldmember
Avatar
3,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Oct 20, 2006 08:51 |  #2

Well yes but not because of failure of the main body. I generall have two cameras around my neck with two different lenses on it


www.forever-yesterday.com (external link)

Gear: 2 Canon 1Ds Mark II, 2 Canon EOS 20D , 580EX flash, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS USM, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 24-70L 2.8, CanonEF 100mm 2.8 USM, Canon EF 85mm 1.8, Canon EF 50mm 1.8, Sigma 20mm f1.8, Peleng Fisheye, 3 AB 800 w/ Pocket Wizzards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Padawan ­ Dad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
908 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Melrose, MA
     
Oct 20, 2006 09:03 |  #3

song4themoon wrote in post #2145346 (external link)
Well yes but not because of failure of the main body. I generall have two cameras around my neck with two different lenses on it

As I do too. But I am only looking for people who have needed to use a 2nd body due to failure of the main camera only. Essentially my question is: Has one of your bodies ever crashed?


Bill Hicks Photography (external link)

Nikon D700 • 50 ƒ/1.4G • 24-70 ƒ/2.8 • 70-200 ƒ/2.8 VRII SB900  iMac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ Kanney
Member
93 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
     
Oct 20, 2006 09:26 as a reply to  @ Padawan Dad's post |  #4

Had a 1D crash 2 weeks ago - should have it back from Canon soon..... I've been doing weddings for over 15 yrs. and have had Nikons, Bronicas, Mamiya's and even Hasselblads crash. It happens...... + the more wedding you do, the more often it will happen. W/my wife as co-shooter on the wedding day we bring (and use) 4 1D platforms and 4 L zoom lens (w/ 4 prime lens for low light use). Maybe a little overkill, but works for us.


keep in focus...
Ed Kanney
Certified Professional Photographer
www.kanneyphotography.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Oct 20, 2006 09:47 as a reply to  @ Ed Kanney's post |  #5

Not since going digital but I did have the shutter go south on my Pentax 6X7 in the middle of a wedding a few years ago. I had a Mamiya RB67 ProS as well. It is not as easily handled for those candid shots or maybe I was used to the ergonomics of the Pentax. At the end of the day the customer never even knew anything had gone wrong.

I personally think that anyone that is going to shoot weddings with just one body is just taunting a disaster. It does happen, not all that often and many will never have it happen. I would never want to have to go to the bride during the wedding and say I'm packing up because my camera just did and I don't have a replacement. I can only imagine what a nerve racking conversation that would be.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Yella ­ Fella
Goldmember
Avatar
1,241 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:04 |  #6

lol the primary main i was shooting with told the B&G that he had ran out of memory space lol


Ed - www.edwardlui.co.uk (external link) | modelmayhem (external link) | facebook (external link)

Canon EOS 5D x2 | Canon EF 35mm f1.4 L USM | Canon EF 50mm f1.2 L USM | Canon EF 85mm f1.2 mkII L USM | Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8 IS L USM |Canon 580EX mkII x2http://www.edwardlui.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
i2iSTUDIOS
Goldmember
1,010 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:42 as a reply to  @ song4themoon's post |  #7

i've never had my Nikons fail but a 2nd shooter has had his canon 20D fail. Luckily he also had his 30D.


i2iSTUDIOS.com (external link)
My Blog (external link)

D800
D3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Padawan ­ Dad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
908 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Melrose, MA
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:43 |  #8

ssim wrote in post #2145535 (external link)
I personally think that anyone that is going to shoot weddings with just one body is just taunting a disaster.

I totally agree with you. I'm just getting an idea of how often this happens with photographers on these forums.


Bill Hicks Photography (external link)

Nikon D700 • 50 ƒ/1.4G • 24-70 ƒ/2.8 • 70-200 ƒ/2.8 VRII SB900  iMac

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seefutlung
Goldmember
Avatar
3,262 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:45 |  #9

Dunno about crash ... does shrapnel in the shutter count?


- Unsharp At Any Speed -
LAShooters (external link) for SoCal shooting
www.garyayala.smugmug.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpuppy
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kingston, Ontario
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:59 |  #10

Mine died right as the bride was meeting the groom for the first time ... tears were flowing and my screen died and half the buttons ... I kept a straight face and flipped my other camera off my shoulder (I usually have 2 on me at all times) and kept shooting. No one knew until after, and even then it was a 'funny story ...' kind of thing.

The biggest thing was that for the rest of the day I worried that my remaining camera would futz out too ... AND I had to change lenses more often (what a pain :).


My Wedding Portfolio (external link) | My Photo Blog (external link) | My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbfoto
Senior Member
655 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Indiana
     
Oct 20, 2006 15:13 |  #11

I had a Elan 7e film camera quit on me just as I was starting to shoot the formals. I grabbed my backup 7e and started shooting. My wife paniced a little but I knew that's why I take a back-up. I was worried some the rest of the night knowing that I no longer had a back-up for my back-up though.

Tom




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 20, 2006 21:44 |  #12

I semi-regularly have a 20D lock up on me, usually during the ceremony when I most need it. A 2nd body is essential. I use it as a 2nd body, not a backup.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Oct 21, 2006 00:00 |  #13

Besides having your main body crash....another good reason to have a second ready to go is if something accidently gets screwed up in the settings and there's no time to figure out what you've done....just grab the back up and go and figure out the original problem when you get a few moments. Another use would be if you're going back and forth between two very different lighting situations such as bright outdoor shots and dimly lit indoor shots. Have one body set up for one scenario and the second body for the other scenario. Another would be to have one body set up for flash photography and the other for ambient light. IMO...a second body at the least is just about mandatory for anyone serious about shooting weddings.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samsen
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,468 posts
Likes: 239
Joined Apr 2006
Location: LA
     
Oct 21, 2006 00:04 |  #14

2 different lens is my first reason to carry two bodies.
Between battery, memory this and that, one of them is sooner that the other to leave me when I am happy to have the second one to take that one particular shot.


Weak retaliates,
Strong Forgives,
Intelligent Ignores!
Samsen
Picture editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jillybean
Senior Member
813 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Columbus, IN
     
Oct 21, 2006 07:01 |  #15

It was some years ago (mamiya 645) and it compeltely locked up as the formals were starting- I did not have a back up with me- panic set in- previously crappy bride just got worse- only saving grace was it was in my town so called husband to bring 35. I stopped doing wedding for about 1 yr after that- too freaked out. Now i NEVER go with out two camera's- sometimes even my old film 35 for reassurance.


jill
www.justjillphoto.com (external link)
www.photosbyjill.blogs​pot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,844 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Have you ever needed your 2nd body?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1823 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.