Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 20 Oct 2006 (Friday) 10:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Heading over to the other side & need help (PC to MAC)

 
neil_r
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:27 |  #1

My dual processor windows workstation is getting long in the toot and the time has come for me to change. I am really tempted to bite the bullet and move over to Apple. I really don’t want to kick off a PC verses Mac debate as there ar many of those all over the place, what I am looking for are some informed opinions and tips from Mac users and preferably from those who may have recently made the transition.

I have looked at the Mac Pro and were I to spec it the way I would like I could not afford a display so I will more than likely go for the 24” iMac with the 2.33GHz Processor 2GB of memory and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 256MB SDRAM graphics card. I know I will have to get additional external storage but the FireWire 800 port should make that fast enough and I would also like to extend the desktop to an additional flat panel monitor (which I already have which will hopefully be compatible)

I have been using Photoshop since Ver 4 and do not intend changing so I doubt that I will have any problems there but OS X will be completely new and any help will be greatly appreciated.

Is the above kit up to the job? Will I find the transition easy? What will I struggle with the most?


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Oct 20, 2006 10:34 |  #2

Should it have an intel processor, you'll dread the performance of CS2. Otherwise, sounds like you're making a good choice.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 11:12 |  #3

Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2145729 (external link)
Should it have an intel processor, you'll dread the performance of CS2. Otherwise, sounds like you're making a good choice.

It is an Intel dual core processor. I understand that CS2 runs in their strange Rosetta mode. I guess that adobe will be bringing out a version of CS2 that will be able to use the speed of the mac pretty soon (I say guess but mean hope).


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Oct 20, 2006 11:48 |  #4

neil_r wrote in post #2145868 (external link)
It is an Intel dual core processor. I understand that CS2 runs in their strange Rosetta mode. I guess that adobe will be bringing out a version of CS2 that will be able to use the speed of the mac pretty soon (I say guess but mean hope).

This was discussed in another thread about CS3 I believe, somebody said that they hvae no plans to do Intel Mac support for CS2. CS3 isn't that far away though.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
staciecd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,383 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Oct 20, 2006 13:02 |  #5

This is something I considered a while ago, but between the cost of the computer, then purchasing all new software was too much. Don't forget to keep that in mind.

stacie


---------------
Digital Rebel XT 350 | Kit Lens, 50mm f/1.8 II, 17-40mm L, 70-200mm f4 L, 70-200mm f2.8 IS, 15mm Fisheye
Speedlight 580EX II, 2 PocketWizard Plus II
Stacie's Portfolio (external link) Updated Feb 2008 | Stacie on Flickr (external link)

---------------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Oct 20, 2006 13:06 as a reply to  @ staciecd's post |  #6

neil_r wrote in post #2145697 (external link)


I have looked at the Mac Pro and were I to spec it the way I would like I could not afford a display so I will more than likely go for the 24” iMac with the 2.33GHz Processor 2GB of memory and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 256MB SDRAM graphics card. I know I will have to get additional external storage but the FireWire 800 port should make that fast enough and I would also like to extend the desktop to an additional flat panel monitor (which I already have which will hopefully be compatible)

I have been using Photoshop since Ver 4 and do not intend changing so I doubt that I will have any problems there but OS X will be completely new and any help will be greatly appreciated.

Is the above kit up to the job? Will I find the transition easy? What will I struggle with the most?

Neil I'm a bit confused. Is the 2GB memory RAM? (or did you mean a 2GHz processor) What's the entire HD size? 2GB is wonderful for ram...definitely necc. for processing photos. We use 1GB ddr sdram and need it at minimum....256 won't cut it for graphics processing of any sort.

edit: and with Mac, the program Aperture $149 and PE4 $79 combination is absolutely perfect. (Right now, aperture is just at the top of it's game...)

edit2: the one thing that will really be different w/Mac is that when you want to delete something, you drag it to the trash. End of story. No uninstalling...no having fragmented files...so easy.


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 13:14 |  #7

I was a Mac user for many years but then had hardly touched one for 5 years until a few weeks ago when I set one up for a client. All I can say is WOW! OS-X is spectacular. You won't regret it. Had I not built myself a new Dual Core PC last month I would definately go Apple. Spec looks spot on to me. You will need to spend time finding your way around the different interface of course, but I found it totally intuitive and didn't need to check help once. The iMac screen is superb too.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bosman
Senior Member
835 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Oct 20, 2006 13:35 |  #8

Permagrin wrote in post #2146269 (external link)
Neil I'm a bit confused. Is the 2GB memory RAM? (or did you mean a 2GHz processor) What's the entire HD size? 2GB is wonderful for ram...definitely necc. for processing photos. We use 1GB ddr sdram and need it at minimum....256 won't cut it for graphics processing of any sort.

edit: and with Mac, the program Aperture $149 and PE4 $79 combination is absolutely perfect. (Right now, aperture is just at the top of it's game...)

edit2: the one thing that will really be different w/Mac is that when you want to delete something, you drag it to the trash. End of story. No uninstalling...no having fragmented files...so easy.

The iMac has a 250GB hard drive, I beleive he is saying 2GB of RAM, and a video card with 256MB of ram on the videocard, which is alot! Not sure what you mean by 256MB of video ram on the video card is not alot???


Joe

Rebel XT with grip
Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
Canon 18-55 3.5-5.6
Canon 50 1.8
420EX
Domke
F-3X
Domke F-5XB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 13:49 |  #9

Bosman wrote in post #2146381 (external link)
The iMac has a 250GB hard drive, I beleive he is saying 2GB of RAM, and a video card with 256MB of ram on the videocard, which is alot! Not sure what you mean by 256MB of video ram on the video card is not alot???

Agreed ... CS2 doesn't really use video card memory so Neil getting 2GB RAM is the correct route to take AFAIC.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 13:57 |  #10

The full spec is:-

Screen 24"
Processor 2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Memory 2GB 667 DDR2 SDRAM
Hard Drive 500GB Serial ATA
Graphics INVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB SDRAM

My main concern is getting to know OS X I am so familiar with the DOS/Windows environment. Plus the mouse only has one button ???


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:04 |  #11

you wont regret it. the mouse the iMacs ship with the mighty mouse (as far as i know) - ie you get your right click back, plus a couple of other buttons. its a joy to use:) OS X is fantastic, its very intuitive and easy to pick up, its built to work with you, not against you and you will soon slip into its way of working.

also, you mentioned you already had a screen. could you not use that with a mac pro? or get a cheaper dell screen or something. i havent used a mac pro but all i can say is they look incredible! either way whichever one you use you will like it! we use imacs for design work at uni and they run great.


edit: take yourself down to an apple store and ask for some help round the OS, they are super helpful in there and will quickly get to grips with what your buying before you make any purchase.


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neil_r
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006
Avatar
18,065 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2003
Location: The middle of the UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:11 |  #12

stupot wrote in post #2146476 (external link)
.also, you mentioned you already had a screen. could you not use that with a mac pro? or get a cheaper dell screen or something. i havent used a mac pro but all i can say is they look incredible! either way whichever one you use you will like it! we use imacs for design work at uni and they run great..

I have a relatively new 24" dell screen, but I do not think it will give me the same brightness, sharpness, and colour depth I have seen in either the iMac which I could just about afford or the Apple Cinema displays that I know I can't afford.


Neil - © NHR Photography
Commercial Site (external link) - Video Site (external link) - Blog - (external link)Gear List There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2384
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:12 |  #13

I've been using Macs for years at home, and PC's at work. I just upgraded my desktop at home with the MacPro Tower. I'm running CS2 on it with no problems, as well as Microsoft Office for Mac. Going between the two is pretty easy. After a while, you'll find you prefer the Mac OS for its ease and elegance of use.

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Oct 20, 2006 19:37 as a reply to  @ Mark_Cohran's post |  #14

Bosman wrote in post #2146381 (external link)
The iMac has a 250GB hard drive, I beleive he is saying 2GB of RAM, and a video card with 256MB of ram on the videocard, which is alot! Not sure what you mean by 256MB of video ram on the video card is not alot???

I thought it was his ram...which wouldn't be enough...a lot of computers come standard with 256 or 512...I was worried that was what he was buying...

Sounds like a good system and you won't have any trouble adjusting. Mac's a lot easier to use.


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stavhp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK
     
Oct 20, 2006 21:11 |  #15

Well, after using my freinds mac and his constant bullying im making hte same move.
Hope its the right one ???


Canon 7D, sigma 17-70, Canon 50mm F1.8, Canon 70-300mm IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stav-p/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,025 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Heading over to the other side & need help (PC to MAC)
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2224 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.