Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Oct 2006 (Friday) 14:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 10-20 mm

 
Broncobear
Goldmember
Avatar
2,415 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:08 |  #1

For my next lens I'm thinking Wide angle, as wide as I can get without having a fish-eye.

One that appealed to me was the Sigma 10-20 mm because it's almost half the price of the canon 10-22mm.

Problem I'm heard a concern about this particular lens. I've tested it out and can confirm, it seems that the picture comes out good if your looking on the subject straight on, if you try to angle a wide angle shot with this lens it's not as good.

Anyone else confirm this?

Since I like to take close up pictures of buldingd and monuments with surroundings, I tend to to take my shots from an angle as opposed to straight on/....adding differen't type of affects if there is water or sun around the subject.

Anyone have anything to add to this issue or recommend a better lens?

thanks


"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." " (external link)Marcel Proust (external link)

Gear& Frank's Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whchan
Member
225 posts
Joined Mar 2005
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:17 |  #2

Broncobear wrote in post #2146492 (external link)
For my next lens I'm thinking Wide angle, as wide as I can get without having a fish-eye.

Problem I'm heard a concern about this particular lens. I've tested it out and can confirm, it seems that the picture comes out good if your looking on the subject straight on, if you try to angle a wide angle shot with this lens it's not as good.

Do not know what's your defination of "not so good". All UWA lens will give a prespective disortion when shooting at an angle. Can you give an example?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:20 |  #3

The only way to capture architecture without distortion is with a tilt-shift lens. All wide lenses will have some form or distortion.


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckie8
Senior Member
Avatar
995 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Wake County, NC
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:34 |  #4

Sigma 10-20 is a nice UWA lens but like everyone else says, all UWA lens do tend to distort a little depending the angle of your shots.


Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:51 |  #5

Rhinotherunt wrote in post #2146535 (external link)
The only way to capture architecture without distortion is with a tilt-shift lens. All wide lenses will have some form or distortion.

Of course, it can be corrected during PP if you have the right software.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Broncobear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,415 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Oct 20, 2006 14:53 |  #6

Can anyone recommentd a decent tilt-shift lens from Canon or sigma. Do they cost a fortune?

The actual dealer was the one who pointed out the distortion, I noticed it on the test camera and test shot he made. I don't know the specifics of how he described it so you have to excuse my ignorance. But from what I saw compared to to the sigma 12-24...the 12-24 took a much nicer angled shot.


"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." " (external link)Marcel Proust (external link)

Gear& Frank's Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Broncobear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,415 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Oct 20, 2006 15:00 |  #7

I answered my own question

CANON TS-E 24MM F3.5L TILT SHIFT LENS $1599.00

Yikes it's quite pricey...


"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." " (external link)Marcel Proust (external link)

Gear& Frank's Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 20, 2006 15:00 |  #8

Tony-S wrote in post #2146639 (external link)
Of course, it can be corrected during PP if you have the right software.

True... true

Broncobear wrote in post #2146649 (external link)
Can anyone recommentd a decent tilt-shift lens from Canon or sigma. Do they cost a fortune?

The actual dealer was the one who pointed out the distortion, I noticed it on the test camera and test shot he made. I don't know the specifics of how he described it so you have to excuse my ignorance. But from what I saw compared to to the sigma 12-24...the 12-24 took a much nicer angled shot.

Canon is the only one I have heard about. They are around $1,200.00 and some more... Is it imparitive that you do not have event the slightest disortion? I would just get the 10-20mm it does a great job for correcting distortion, and you could correct in PP. If you are getting paid for architecture shots you need the tilt-shift lens. Then again if you were getting paid you would know that...


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Broncobear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,415 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Oct 20, 2006 15:14 |  #9

your right, I'm an amateur and of course not getting paid. so you think in it's class of wide angles around that range it's the best one to go with Rhino?


"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." " (external link)Marcel Proust (external link)

Gear& Frank's Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 20, 2006 15:33 |  #10

If you have deep pockets and want brand name get the Canon 10-22. If you want bang per buck get the Sigma 10-20. If you plan on going FF neither will work. Get the 17-40L.


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Broncobear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,415 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Oct 20, 2006 15:59 |  #11

what is FF?


"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes." " (external link)Marcel Proust (external link)

Gear& Frank's Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 20, 2006 16:01 |  #12

Full frame like 5D


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Treat ­ me ­ like ­ a ­ tourist
Goldmember
Avatar
1,614 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 60
Joined Oct 2005
Location: North Wales
     
Oct 20, 2006 18:51 |  #13

The 10-22 is a stupid price here in the uk, but there is a website that i have found where it is far more reasonable, i have ordered from there in the past with no problems, i intend to order the canon 10-22 next month,,,, if they have it in stock.
Here is the link
www.onestop-digital.com (external link)


Facebook (external link)
Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karfeef
Senior Member
333 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Liverpool
     
Oct 20, 2006 18:58 as a reply to  @ Treat me like a tourist's post |  #14

holy crumbs - £359 for the 10-22 :) good reviews from customers too. that's my next purchase methinks!

Thanks Tourist.


Canon 500d | Canon 28-135mm IS USM | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 18-55 IS Kit | 2x Canon 430ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raphael ­ Emond
Senior Member
Avatar
430 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
     
Oct 21, 2006 16:54 |  #15

For the wide angle shots, nothing beats the siggy 12-24 in the distortion department.
Slow lens, but for architecture, just stop it down f8-f11 and on a crop body, it's perfect.


Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
420EX, Sigma 1.4X Converter, Moded Off-Shoe Cord 2, 2x1Gb + 1x2Gb, Pelican 1550 Case, Hoya IR72, Mono-Tripod.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,359 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Sigma 10-20 mm
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2695 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.