1/6th sec at f/18 at 100 ISO
C&C would be awesome. Be hard on me pleae. Harder you are, the more I learn.
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
michaelbehlen Senior Member 352 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Fresno, Ca More info | Oct 20, 2006 20:24 | #1 1/6th sec at f/18 at 100 ISO
Michael Behlen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Oct 20, 2006 20:32 | #2 Your getting there _ go even slower on the shutter speed. Stop the aperture down to f/22 and also this is where a 2 to 4 stop Neutral Density Filter would help getting the shutter speed down.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 20, 2006 20:49 | #3 A ND, shall be my next investment. Slower on thw ater, Ill try that next time. Thanks. Also, this was handheld, camera on a rock. Michael Behlen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop 29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Oct 20, 2006 21:26 | #4 Very nice. I assume you want the bluish cast, although it makes it look a little un-natural. To go slower than 1/6, you'll need a tripod. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
samsen Cream of the Crop 7,468 posts Likes: 239 Joined Apr 2006 Location: LA More info | Oct 20, 2006 21:35 | #5 Bring out those light spots on the dark rock, even if it is to replace them with almost white color and check if 3D works better. Weak retaliates,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lostdoggy King Duffus 4,787 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Queens, NY More info | Oct 20, 2006 21:36 | #6 Very Nice work!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HrcRacing Goldmember 2,019 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: NE Florida, USA More info | The water at that shutter speed is actually pretty cool looking. Very unique from most with almost a plastic look to it. Almost like a Halloween wig or something. I like it. Robert
LOG IN TO REPLY |
weemannie Goldmember 2,530 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Scottish Highlands More info | I actually like the blurring you achieved at that speed. Regards, Trevor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 21, 2006 02:06 | #9 The B;ue was PP, It was a really bright and happy picture before hand, and that wasnt what I was aiming at. I did have a polarizer, I should have used it, but like I said I dindt have my tripod with me, so no luck there. Thanks for the comments. Michael Behlen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2798 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||