Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Oct 2006 (Monday) 12:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma lens

 
wii_irish_lad
Member
138 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:06 |  #1

I was browsing for a new lens, when I came across the Sigma Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto 28-70mm f/2.8-4 for $75. Can anyone tell me if this is a good WA lens?


K2 | Canon 28-90mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 | Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4

Visit My Gallery Please! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:19 |  #2

Unless you have a 5D or a 1Ds, it's not really a wide angle lens. More a normal-telephoto lens for the APS-C sensor format.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wii_irish_lad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
138 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:26 |  #3

Is it worth buying if all i currently have is a Rebel K2 and the standard 28mm-90mm lens?


K2 | Canon 28-90mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 | Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4

Visit My Gallery Please! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stavhp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:28 |  #4

wii_irish_lad wrote in post #2158151 (external link)
Is it worth buying if all i currently have is a Rebel K2 and the standard 28mm-90mm lens?

Well its not gonna be any wider than what you have now.
18-55 if you are looking for something wide for your Rebel


Canon 7D, sigma 17-70, Canon 50mm F1.8, Canon 70-300mm IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stav-p/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stavhp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:30 |  #5

Hmm...Just noticed you have a K2 not digital Rebel so the 18-5 is useless to you


Canon 7D, sigma 17-70, Canon 50mm F1.8, Canon 70-300mm IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stav-p/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wii_irish_lad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
138 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:32 as a reply to  @ Stavhp's post |  #6

Yes. At the moment, I can't afford a digi-rebel. I want the XTi, but my budget won't allow it...


K2 | Canon 28-90mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 | Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4

Visit My Gallery Please! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:35 |  #7

For film... I would get a 17-40mm L


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stavhp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:37 |  #8

Rhinotherunt wrote in post #2158186 (external link)
For film... I would get a 17-40mm L

Well, if he cant afford a rebel and teh last lens he looked at was $75 do you really think he could get a lens that expensive???


Canon 7D, sigma 17-70, Canon 50mm F1.8, Canon 70-300mm IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stav-p/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:38 |  #9

If you've currently got a 28-90, why get a 28-70? Your only significant gain from this would be the faster aperture by about a stop. If you need wider than 28 on film, consider maybe the Tamron 19-35. Not a bad, inexpensive, lens.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 23, 2006 12:54 |  #10

Stavhp wrote in post #2158200 (external link)
Well, if he cant afford a rebel and teh last lens he looked at was $75 do you really think he could get a lens that expensive???

Ooops... LOL! you have a point! Hmmm...


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lakiluno
slightly jealous
Avatar
2,895 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland)
     
Oct 23, 2006 13:42 |  #11

Hmm....

If you want a wide angle, then your looking at third party lenses. One thing you could do if you wanted a WA prime is to get something in a M42 (old manual focus mount) and get an adapter. You'd lose auto focus, but at <20mm you barely need to take it off infinity anyway. You can get some 15-24mm primes for m42 for not very much, but you need to look hard. give http://www.keh.com (external link) a go - look under "Pentax screw mount."

Otherwise, the tamron recommended above would be a good try.


Leo
20D|Tamron 17-50 2.8|Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro|50 1.8|Sigma EF-500 DG Super|
My Photo Gallery (external link) *New* | My Gear List | Backup Photos Easily with Robocopy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,324 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Sigma lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2694 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.